Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
First you are assuming that the fossils were all laid down at the same time in many different places and then assuming the event/cause was the flood described in religious texts.
|
That's almost correct. I am assuming a worldwide flood (my third axiom) but I am not presupposing any of the specific details in Scripture. Where is it written that I can't borrow all the world's global flood legends and those Biblical passages that indicate a theory of devolution and make scientific postulates out of them?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
Nothing could be further from the truth.
|
I don't believe that you have grasped the first axiom of quantum creationism. Where is your refutation of the mathematical proposition that there is no limit to improbability in quantum theory?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
All this aside, have you given any though to where the water for this flood came from or went to afterward?
|
I have answered that question in
post #28:
Quote:
Can you really prove that no fantastic quantum mechanical explanation exists that might justify the third postulate? Here's someone with enough imagination to at least believe that the third postulate is conceivable:
The Biblical Flood Explained
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
Why wasn't all sea life killed out right by all the freshwater? Of if it was somehow salt water why wasn't all fresh water life killed off at this time?
|
One possibility is a fantastic quantum improbability. If fast and slow moving molecules can be separated and prevented from mixing, then the same trick can be applied to freshwater and saltwater. I went into incredible detail how this could be done on a molecular level in
post #35.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
These two questions are more than enough to prove no world wide flood ever occurred.
|
I have refuted your refutation decidedly by invoking my first axiom. Your proof is clearly invalid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
Second you are assuming that all hydrocarbon deposits were formed in a short period of time,
|
Yes, I believe that's a reasonable conclusion from what I've written.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
oil deposits are slowly refilling, even now, but at a rate too slow to do us any good.
|
Where? When will the processes be completed? I think you're making ridiculous assertions without proof.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
but even if hydrocarbon deposits are indeed geology reworking biology it happens so slowly we would never expect to see significant hydrocarbon deposits form in historic times.
|
That makes no sense to me. If Darwinism is correct, then we should expect that vast quantities of plant biomass is already on its way toward producing large deposits of oil and coal in every stage of development. Where is it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moontanman
Creationism raises far more questions that it can even begin to answer, it is not and cannot be science, ever!
|
David Hilbert's Philosophy of Physics is the highest and purest form of science ever conceptualized by the human mind. When Darwinism is compared to any true science, it is found that Darwinism is just an anecdote. See
The Incorrigible Dr. Berlinski.
