Quote:
Originally Posted by InfiniteNow
Is that the physics textbook from 1960 that you said you're using, the one that's outdated and wrong on several important points?
|
"Doppler Space Time" copyright 2000 is my book by Starway Scientific Press. That was after 25 years of writing. The trouble is that there are three basic conversion solutions.
M = Q (kilograms = AC charge)
M = QC (kilograms = AC charge times the speed of light)
M = Q/C (kilograms = AC charge divided by the speed of light)
Einstein believed that mass and charge were sisters. That means mass can become charges and charges can become mass. It does not mean that mass is a DC charge.
Of course we are still stuck with four different things since AC charge is not DC charge but derived from it. As I put the Dot-Wave theory on the internet, I see that it is confusing to people. In addition Some of the professors responded saying they could not understand what I am saying.
Thus I have to rewrite my words in order to get the point across better. The internet is good for me to discuss the various point before the Dot Wave theory is published. I usually buy 1000 to 1500 books at McNaughton &Gunn. Most I give away to university libraries because this is my hobby adventure. I do not make any money. It costs me tens of thousands over the years. All hobbies cost money.
My 1960 textbooks written by Weidner professor of Rutgers and Sell professor of State University at Geneseo, NY contain the data would has not really changed. It does not contain string theory. It has basic quantum mechanics. Most important to me is the data.
Are you saying that the u-meson shower data is different now that in 1960?
Has Einsteins theory changed since 1960? I may be wrong but to me the other thing which changed is that people got set in their ways. They became over-educated in subparticle theory. That is not my interest. I am interested in the basic structure of matter.
The basic structure can produce an infinity of subparticles. It can produce black holes and stars and planets beyond the imagination. Who cares to understand all the variations that can be produced by the dots. It is important to understand the dots themselves.
Once you understand the dots and dot-waves then you can move ahead. Look at what they are doing at CERN. Look at all the money to build the greatest proton smasher. All I need is 10 billion dollars and I can build the first
proton to photonic energy source.
Someday the scientists will realize that they most go to the basics. They will then discover the dots. I sent my work out to many European Institutions. They will review it. Sometimes it will take a year or more before I get responses. Doppler Space Time got many good responses but I did not understand how the plus dot and the minus dot combine to produce the bipolar dot. I did not understand that the Heisenberg uncertainty principle was the result of mechanical energy continually converting into electrical energy.
The scientists went astray when they omitted the Einsteian energy increase from the Bohr model.
Oh well. Most people give me three seconds. They they decide what I say does not agree with what they have been taught. I understand that. They cannot overcome their programming. Few people have the ability to do that.
They cannot think on their own. We are only programmed robots. We do not compute! A few of us think beyond our programming.
Often when I solved problems at work that other could not solve, they believed that I used whitchcraft. When I designed logic circuits in my head, they could not understand how the things I designed worked perfectly since my designs are not conventional.
I solve the rubic cube by merely spinning the sides without any thought whatsoever.
So it is self evident to me that two dots produce the universe and two dots produce the bipolar dot. One thing good from Brian Greene the Elegant Universs on page 203
"Rutherford said: "If you cannot explain a result in simple non-technical terms then you really don't understand it". On page 130 he states
"There are other physicists who are deeply unsettled by the fact that the two foundational pillars of physics are at their core fundamentally incompatible. (general relativity and quantum mechanics)
So there is hope for man. They have gone astray for the last fifty years. My work will go out and things will change. Many will deny me but eventually man will come to understand the truth of what I say.
