Science Forums 2

[jerrygg38]

Originally Posted by Theory5

But how do you support your theory without using circular reasoning?

JG: I just tie my theory into existing theory. Thus it must agree with the data in my physics and electrical books. However I correct those books as required.


Care to elaborate on these "fancy" calculations?

JG: I just have and will show more calculations

And by Photonic converter do you mean one of those quantum cascade lasers? The quantum cascade lasers were thought of and were first demonstrated in 1994 by Jerome Faist, Federico Capasso, Deborah Sivco, Carlo Sirtori, Albert Hutchinson, and Alfred Cho at Bell Laboratories.
And I belive those lasers are being developed already.

JG: I have very limited knowledge of such things. Basically I learn of some new ideas from TV or limited books which I scan.


See this is why I have a reason to doubt you. There is no such thing as an aegis class destroyer, The aegis system and the ship that it is mounted on have no relation to each other. The first ships who where built with it were modeled after the Spruance-class destroyers.

JG: I am sorry. I forget things. I have to look at my resume. My system was used on the Beklnap and newer Aegis destroyers. I still have my Dept. of Navy Sea Systems command cup. It shows the gun for the CG26 Gun Weapon system. Even when I worked for Sperry, I paid little attention to the various names of the ships. I went on several of them but in general my Boss and the Senior Engineer did the communication with the Navy officials.
I did the design and they did the talking. And they had good memories and I never had a good memory for names. I remember faces quite well but cannot remember names at all.
Anyway the first system was the CSC in which we had a man in the gun. The SDC/GMP was unmaned and had to be waterproof as it was in the same room as the shells. I never saw the room. My boss did. I never saw the SDC/GMP aboard ship. I only saw the CSC aboard ship. They sent me to Dahlgren Virginia to discuss the hardware with the software people. The government programmers did the softward. The also sent me to Louisville to test out the gun. funny a navy gun in Louisville. They used to shoot down all the planes as they left the airport. Funny shooting down commercial airlines. So the system worked. They shot down all the targets. Of course no one was hurt. No one even knew that they were being shot down. A strange video game using the million dollar CSC to shoot down real planes. Everytime the computer told them they shot the plane down they would clap.


"I also find it interesting that you do not mention that you worked for Lockheed Martin."

JG: Lockheed Martin took over a lot. My older daughter works there. No I worked at Sperry Gyro which became Sperry Rand at Great Neck LI NY.
I forgot to say that in 1970-1972 I worked for Port of NT authority. I did the lighting towers at LaGuardia and the fuel pumping relay station which used old fashioned relay logic instead of modern computers. It was funny building computers out of relays. A whole building instead of modern electronics. They said the Local 3 electricians would not work computers.

Anyway Sperry Rand was taken over by Burroughs/Unisys. Then started the layoffs. It was still Unisys during the layoffs of 1993. I still have the Unisys lifetime medical plan. The Engineers union fought to maintain it and they won. I lost everything in 1993 because I was 2 weeks short of 55. However after 10 years we got a small class action settlement and I won back the lifetime medical plan for me and my wife.

You also mention that we are "close-minded" and only belive what we were taught. I belive I should mention, as it has been mentioned before and will be mentioned again, that we as a scientific community are VERY open minded. But our "flaw" is that we want theory's and other new idea's to be backed up by something other than circular reasoning.

JG: That sounds great. I do not know how old you are. One Chair at a leading Florida university was very honest. He said he was about my age and could not review the theory. He said he had a young professor that would review it. That is the problem. The people in power have 30 or 40 years behind them. To tell them that their understanding is wrong and that they have been preaching wrong ideas for 30 years, is too much for them to bear.

The young do have the ability to confront new ideas. This is especially true if they have not moved upward into the positions of power. However I may be a great problem solver but my wife thinks I am an idiot with respect to many things. So I am half idiot/half genius.


if there is a "massless" atom photon or otherwise, does it exist? Everything has mass, no matter how small it is.

JG: That is what you believe. Why do you believe this??? In order to find truth you must deny everything. Then you must build up truth slowly. You make a statement that everything has mass.
I say that is wrong. Everything has energy. The dot by itself has no mass. It only has momentum and energy. It has charge but no mass.

the bipolar dot does have mass. Thus energy takes two forms. Electrical energy without mass and mechanical energy with mass. That is where physics has gone astray. Unfortunately people make laws which seem to be true but are only partially true. Einsteins orbital laws are excellent but not Einsteins linear laws. So you have beautiful orbital laws and incorrect linear laws produced by the great Einstein.

Half truths are made into whole truths.So everyone learn half truths and half falsehoods.



But isnt photonics the science of generating, controlling, and detecting photons?

JG: I never heard the word until I thought it up a few months ago. Then I started hearing about it. I like the photonic converter to describe the conversion of mass into photonic energy.

Please help me to understand this.
-Theory

JG: I will try the best I can. I am limited in my ability to express myself. At sperry I had to describe how my designed worked. No one understand it. However we had technical writers. I would explain to them and they would produce the required technical books. I try my best but I do not always express myself well.