[QUOTE=CraigD;243230]In reading your posts, jerrygg38, A couple of questions come to mind:
- If the unit of charge in your theory is +/-7.062e-39 e, how does it explain the absence of any directly or indirectly measured elementary particle with charge other than 0, +/-1/3, +/- 2/3, and +/-1 e? (source: wikipedia article “list of particles”)
JG: Firstly my studies involve the smallest subparticle in the universe, the dot. This means it cannot be measured. The question of why you get 1/3, 2/3, and 0, and 1 is a question of large scale high energy physics rather than basic fundamental smallest particle physics. Things are different. Since this is New Theories I assumed that people would be interested in a theoretical theory. If they want proven theories then it should have been "existing modifications to proven theories." I study what cannot be seen or measured. As far as the 1/3 is concerned, that is a different area of study. My analysis of the proton specifies that it is made up mainly of three major ingredients. If you chop the proton apart you will chop the total charge into 3 parts. If the charge to mass ratio is constant, then you will get Q=1/3.
Thus it seems quite likely that 1/3 is a good number for the charge. But that is not the basic interest in the dot theory.
According to my calculations there are 1.416E38 positive dots in a proton. For 1/3 there are 0.472E38 dots for 1/3 charge.
How can you measure these dots? Light is composed of plus and minus dots. Thus the dots show up in the photons. For every level of energy of a photon, the number of dots can be calculated.
Dots also show up in the electrical field. The field itself is composed of space dots each one has q=1.13E-57Coulombs. The electromagnetic field is dots in motion.
More important, however, is the following question:
- Does your theory make any testable predictions different than well-accepted theories, such as standard particle physics or classical mechanics and electrodynamics? If so, what is such a prediction?
JG: I just explain the theories by my dots. My theory does not replace the other theories. I just add into them.
When posting at hypography, members need to follow the
site rules, the first of which is
JG: Ok. I will hit the color blue I answer. Are other colors okay?
In general, back up your claims by using links or references.
This means that when you make claims such as you
must back them up with links or reference to credible sources.
I present a complete theory so I have no sources other than myself. It is my theory. Doppler Space Time is my book. When I use data from my physics books I refer to them.
Also, you mustn’t make up terms without explaining them in conventional terms.
Ok I will try my best.
As a general rule, you should avoid criticizing well accepted theory by calling it “silly”.
Okay. Sorry to hurt feelings. It is very upsetting to people to have their beliefs damaged. I will just say I disagree and state why.
You should not attempting to support your claim by bragging that you have solved problems that engineers were unable to solve, leading them to “believe you used witchcraft”, or that you have “solve the rubic cube by merely spinning the sides without any thought whatsoever”.
JG: Ok I will try to restrain my personality and humourous comments. It is true but what I think is funny others may be horrified at.
In addition to being incredible and unsupported (problems that you could rectify by posting links or references to credible literature describing your apparently supernatural abilities, or, say, a youtube video of you solving a Rubic’s cube), such arguments are examples of a logical fallacy, which, as is also stated in the rules, are to be avoided.
ok
If you are consistently unable to follow the site rules, your posting privileged at hypography will be suspended. [/QUOTE
COLOR="blue"][/COLOR]
ok. We will see how it goes. Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that.
The only good thing is that I have a small group of readers who always want a copy of my latest work. Some colleges do put my books in their libraries and some students email me and thank me for my ideas. This is very small but I feel the right ideas into the right mind will achieve advancement for mankind.
