Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 11-09-2008   #3 (permalink)
Moontanman's Avatar
Moontanman
Astounding Vision


Location:
South Eastern North Carolina, Cape Fear Region
 
Moontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond reputeMoontanman has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Moontanman
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: How secure is our space project future?

I think there is some reason to think the US space program is in trouble. The US seems to be infatuated with spreading our culture around the world, by force if necessary (no cracks about us not having a culture please) This absolute stupidity is sucking money away from many things and very few seen to be worried about the cost.

If we were to invest 10% of this money into an active and aggressive space program the US would own the inner solar system in just a few decades. No one else could possible keep up and we would (for those hawks) effectively own the highest of all high grounds. In warfare who ever owns the high ground has always be thought of as having a tremendous advantage.

So far our military seems to have missed this point. Once we are active and installed in force in places like the asteroids, Jupiter's Lagrange points and even further out the moons of Saturn we (or who ever has the will and drive to do this) will be completely in control of the high ground.

Why would this be advantageous? Even if you dismiss the tremendous amounts of easily accessible raw materials and the ability to make things in zero gee that cannot be made on the earth, imagine if a county attacked us and a few days later their major military bases were to disappear in a multimegaton explosion with no radioactivity involved! Just the threat of such a thing would be sobering to most if not all countries.

Countries that support terrorism could draw retribution for any attacks by weapons of mass destruction without endangering nearby cities and people with radioactive fall out. The high ground is where we need to be, if not the US then it will be someone else, eventually.


----------------
Michael
Life is the poetry of the universe.
Love is the poetry of life.

Nuclear is the only real option!
http://www.nuclearspace.com/Liberty_ship_menupg.aspx

Over heard from a three year old, "Daddy why do my toes get sticky when I eat strawberry jam?"

Never wrestle a troll. You both get dirty and the troll likes it

Proud graduate of Wossamotta University!

Last edited by Moontanman; 11-09-2008 at 11:39 AM..
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network