Science Forums 2

[jedaisoul]

Hi Jerry, I've enjoyed reading your ideas, but I have a few comments that I hope you will take in the manner they are intended:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

The big problem is that in order for man to survive upon this earth he must replace obsolete energy sources with proton to photonic converters.

This is an unsupported claim. When the non-renewable energy sources are depleted, if we have not found some other source of economically viable energy, we will have to make-do with nuclear and renewable energy sources. There is no reason to assume that man will cease to survive upon the Earth, That is just an attention grabbing sound bite with no logic to support the claim. I'd expect that of the media, but not from someone who claims to have a serious interest in the subject.

What is true is that it will be unlikely that we will be able to afford tio be so profligate and thoughtless in our use of energy. The same applies to the other non-renewable resources. But these lessons have been learned, and ignored, many times before. For example, farmers who continually take more out of the soil than they put back, either have to move on or end up living in an arid desert.

So mankind will have to change his attitude to non-reneable resources of all kinds. That is very different from claiming that we will cease to exist.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

The dot theory shows the dot structure of the proton from an Einsteinian energy viewpoint which shows that 3.482MEV added spherically to a proton will produce 938.272MEV of photonic energy. This is not added by linear accelerators but by spherical pulsating electromagnetic fields.

Have you had the opportunity to build such a machine on a test scale?

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Our spaceships can travel on a beam of light. The beam is dangerous when in operation but once it is shut off the photonic engine is non-radioactive. Thus any fuel such as water or iron can be used.
We can get to the moon in 3.5 hours. We will ride the light beam at constant acceleration of G. Halfway to the moon we will reverse to a deceleration of -g. Thus except for a reversal of one minute, we will never be weightless. The photonic fuel cell is a very gentle method of space travel.
In Doppler Space Time 2000 we can get to Mars or Venus in a little over 2 days. Pluto requires 25 days. We can also get to Alpha Centauri in reasonable time.

These claims seem unrealistic, but I admit I have not done the maths. How do you get from the Earth to the moon in 3.5 hours at only 1 G? Even if that is true, how much energy (in the form of light) will need to be expelled to drive a spaceship, say 1,000 kilograms, at 1 G? Won't that have an effect similar to setting off a nuclear bomb (in terms of the light output)?

Note: I believe that the photon drive is already being developed, to take unmanned probes to the outer reaches of the solar system (and beyond) using the energy from the sun to provide the propulsion. But the accelleration is extremely slow and the time taken is in decades.

I find the following comments condescending:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Someday the scientists will realize that they most go to the basics. They will then discover the dots.
[snip]
The scientists went astray when they omitted the Einsteian energy increase from the Bohr model.

I thionk you also need to reconsider the following:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

I have been banned by so many groups over the years.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Unfortunately most people are preconditioned to believe the status quo. That is fine. This will not produce the photonic engine. Perhaps in another hundred years the powers that be will realize that the universe is a simple place. Then we can move forward. On the other hand global warming may destroy everything before then.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Oh well. Most people give me three seconds. They they decide what I say does not agree with what they have been taught. I understand that. They cannot overcome their programming. Few people have the ability to do that.
They cannot think on their own. We are only programmed robots. We do not compute! A few of us think beyond our programming.

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that.

You might benefit from reconsidering the reasons why you have been banned so many times. Saying: "They cannot think on their own" and "Most groups that I have dealt with do not want to hear any new ideas. So they throw me out. I undestand that" just reveals how little you understand. I find that groups like this are interested in new ideas. Indeed that is a major reason why the groups exist. But there are rules. You get thrown out for repeatedly breaking the rules, not for expressing revolutionary ideas.

Lastly:

Originally Posted by jerrygg38

So there is hope for man. They have gone astray for the last fifty years. My work will go out and things will change. Many will deny me but eventually man will come to understand the truth of what I say.

This is simply messianic. It shows you in a very poor light. You need to consider not how closed minded people are, but how open minded they are to even listen to your ideas when they are interspersed with such egotistical nonsense.