Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 11-20-2008   #287 (permalink)
Galapagos's Avatar
Galapagos
Explaining


Location:
Fl
 
Galapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond reputeGalapagos has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Galapagos
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Evolution Must Be Taught in Public Schools

As far as "teaching both" and letting children decide, debate, or apply critical thinking to issues mythology/magic vs. science... I think Massimo Pigliucci summed the response to this up well when addressing Sara Palin's views on "teaching both" :

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pigliucci
Now this is disingenuous at best. Education is not about having “kids debate both sides,” since most kids would probably conclude that the earth is flat and at the center of the universe (after all, the sensorial evidence is overwhelming in favor of the flat-earth, Ptolemaic system). Education is, at its core, about two things: a) We want our students to have access to the best of what humanity has produced, be that in science, philosophy, literature, economics or what have you. b) We want to provide students with the necessary tools to engage in critical thinking and serious analysis of whatever claim comes under their scrutiny.

According to criterion (a), “teaching both” isn’t going to cut it, because creationism is simply not even in the ballpark of the best ideas ever produced by humanity. On the contrary, it is superstitious nonsense that harks back to an earlier era of ignorance about how the world works. But things aren't much rosier for creationists under criterion (b) either, despite all the talk about “teaching the controversy.” Learning critical thinking is not a matter of being exposed to a “fair and balanced” view of everything and be told “you decide.” Rather, it proceeds through learning about logic, about assessing evidence, and about the many ways in which human senses and reasoning abilities can fail us if we are not on guard. If students really do assimilate all of that, just one look at creationist claims would make it painfully clear that they don’t need to be further entertained.
If we're going to teach creationism in school it either needs to be in a class about religion or mythology. Allowing equal scientific discussion of creationism is the equivalent of allowing serious discussion of alchemy, astrology, and the theory that the moon is made out of cheese.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:02 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network