hi jerry,
i found this in the internet. it seemed to be conceptually similar with your dot theory. its here if your interested ...
Fundamental Particle Physics, The Geatron Nuclear Model, MegForce.com: Physics, Order of the Forces, Fundamental Particle, Unifying Theory
THE PERFECT NUCLEAR MODEL:
A perfect nuclear model will be able to answer each of the above questions along with any other relevant question and be able to correct the unsound assumptions listed here and those other unsound assumptions administered by our scientific overseers. This model will be able to identify the ONE fundamental particle from which all other particles are formed and the ONE fundamental force from which all other forces are derived. It will illustrate the nature and origin of this and other fundamental forces. The model will show the structure, exact composition and the methods of formation of every composite rudimentary, elementary, sub-nuclear and subatomic particle that is known to exist. The model must define energy and identify its primary sources. The model must provide a fundamental constant that will be the unit by which matter and energy will be measured. The model will provide an extensive list of valid predictions that will describe everything from the system for solar energy production to the internal workings of a black hole. Without limitation, the model will explain the mysterious nuclear events presently described as the nuclear strong interaction, nuclear strong force, nuclear weak interaction, nuclear weak force, electromagnetic force, and gravity. And it must provide specific data for existing composite particles that have not been detected and those that may not be detectable for various reasons. It will identify Dark Matter and Dark Energy and their origin. Finally, the model will demonstrate the structure of matter, its methods of assembly and system of nuclear bonds.
WHAT MUST EXIST:
To answer all of the above questions, a basic application experiment will demonstrate that only three distinct fundamental particles are required, no less and no more, with each having a simple, yet, distinct property. However, to proceed freely and without hindrance or interference, it is important to disregard all current theories and all unproven nuclear models. For this experiment to succeed, we must assume that all previously formulated or currently accepted theories and models are incorrect and not allow any influence there from. This experiment must be based upon the actual physical experimental and observational data and direct evidence in possession, pertaining to everything we know about the pertinent subjects of physics. Considering everything that is known of nuclear and particle physics, analyzing it and determining all reasonable possibilities, at the Fundamental Nuclear Level, this is the simplest possible system that could exist:
1. Since every composite elementary or subatomic particle known has an electric charge that corresponds to one of the three possible charge states (+, –, 0), this signifies that only two fundamental particles are required to explain the existence of all charged and neutral particles including all events of particle charge transformation.
A. One fundamental particle must have a constant whole positive electric charge with a magnitude of 1.602 x 10-19 Coulombs, equal to the charge carried by the positron. This will be identified as the A-particle. Note: Keep in mind that this identified electric charge is fundamental, however, the positron and other known particles that carry the charge may not be fundamental.
B. The second fundamental particle must have a constant whole negative electric charge with a magnitude of 1.602 x 10-19 Coulombs, equal to the charge carried by the electron. This will be identified as the B-particle. Note: Keep in mind that this identified electric charge is fundamental, however, the electron and other known particles that carry the charge may not be fundamental.
a. This will show that composite particles with positive electric charges are a result of one extra positive charge in composition relative to the total number of negative charges. Stated another way, the total of positive and negative charges in composition are in equal numbers except for the one extra positive electric charge that identifies the particle's charge. Note: This applies to all known elementary and subatomic particles, both charged and neutral, such as the electron, positron, proton, neutron, the subatomic, and the muon, pion kaon, the elementary, etc., because the evidence shows that they are composite particles. Consider the mass, electric charge, charge magnitude and particle classification differences as related to the electron, positron and proton? Both the electron and positron are classified as leptons and have an identical mass of .511 MeV and the identical charge magnitude of 1.602 x 10-19 Coulombs, yet the proton, a baryon with a mass 1800 times that of the positron, has an electric charge that is identical in magnitude and in every other way to that of the positron?
b. This will show that composite particles with negative charges are a result of one extra negative charge in composition relative to the total number of positive charges. Stated another way, the total of positive and negative charges in composition are in equal numbers except for the one extra negative electric charge that identifies the particle's charge. Note: This applies to all known elementary and subatomic particles, both charged and neutral, such as the electron, positron, proton, neutron, the subatomic, and the muon, pion kaon, the elementary, etc., because the evidence shows that they are composite particles.
c. This will show that composite particles with neutral charges are simply a result of equal numbers of positive and negative charges in composition. Because the positive and negative charges are in equal numbers, this will neutralize the electric charge and the result is a neutral particle. Note: This applies to all known elementary and subatomic particles, both charged and neutral, such as the electron, positron, proton, neutron, etc., because the evidence shows that they are composite particles.
d. This conforms with all known research and data relating to any and every charged or neutral particle.
2. Since photons, elementary and subatomic particles exhibit both particle properties and wave properties, this signifies that a third fundamental particle must exist exhibiting both vibration and, under certain conditions, oscillation, along with some method of attraction to other indivisible particles, small composite particles and mass, in general.
C. Therefore, this third particle that must exist is required to be a vibrating particle with possibly a net ‘0’ electric charge; however, as the evidence indicates, it must also exhibit some form of attraction through the electric charge or through some other force and must also exhibit a frequency of vibration within some system. These complicated requirements will make it difficult to identify such a particle; nevertheless, it will be found, and to remain consistent, it will be named the C-particle.
These are the three requirements and at the same time, the clues that must help us to identify the actual fundamental particles. From these three particles, all forces including gravity, energy, and the structure, composition and the formation of rudimentary, elementary, sub-nuclear, and subatomic particles are explained.
D. However, the evidence shows that a fourth particle must exist; as it turns out, this very simple particle appears to be the origin of the previous three, it will be named the D-particle. We know that it exists because it is simply an A, B, or C particle that has lost its primary property through some nuclear event. But, it is also a particle that has not yet converted into an A, B, or C particle, therefore, it must be a D-particle.
By determining "What Must Exist" or the minimum requirements of fundamental particle properties that could and must account for the existence of energy, the forces and the formation and composition of matter, it will be observed that the system described above provides the basis for the Geatron Nuclear Model.
