Quote:
Originally Posted by FRIPRO
My friends of the Forum: I have asked this question several time, "What if the Universe was rotating in an infinite nothingness?"
Would that not explain many questions being asked in the past 400strings on this thread?
|
No, it does not. Like the Newton Bucket idea that Mach argue with about the time Einstein was coming up with SR -- ~1905; You have a something
rotating against a background of nothing, you have no reference to judge
what anything is doing. No measure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRIPRO
Just because the slowing red shift is judged as meaning the Universe is expanding, it also could mean it is rotating. A rotating Universe would explain gyroscopic gravity to me--why not to the rest of our questioning fourm members?
|
Increasing red shift with distance (said slightly different than yours) is not
associated directly with universal expansion. It is associated with the fact that the expansion was slowing -- an argument for a closed universe.
Recent WMAP probe data now show the universe to be accelerating in its expansion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRIPRO
The Big Bag could be a local bang in an eternal Universe. There are billions of Big Bangs in this eternal Universe together with their vortex centers (Black Holes).
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRIPRO
These uncountable galatic systems centers (so called black holes) are spawning grounds for fantastic energy beams that make more vortexs within the dark matter of the eternal universe.
|
Galaxies are not likely to be "uncountable" in the universe, even if the universe were infinite in size. You misunderstand the meaning of the word.
In mathematics the Real numbers are uncountable while the integers are not. Integers can ONLY be countable ! (1, 2, 3, ...)
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRIPRO
The Universe has no beginning and no end--eternal, just more of the same construction in strings, waves, vortexs, sine wave oscillating gas cloud radiation outputs, converting to mass and back via the Universe's atmosphere--Newton's AEther or ether.
Of course this is a hypothesis who can prove otherwise?
|
Wheeler invented the term "Multiverse" to hypothesize the idea of a "Universe" of universes. Maybe yes, maybe no. There are a lot of papers out there on the ideas spawn from, on "Bubble Universes".
None of this has to do with Aether (which BTW -- Newton had nothing to do with).
maddog
