|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Origin of the Universe,,,,Bang or no Bang
My friend: Inside the international space station (INS) all soap bubbles are nearly spherical and float gently (wobble) with the breeze. In fact man moves (side by side)within the cabin at the same rate-unless he is pushed by some mechanics.
This simple display, we all have seen on our TV screen.
That same space station uses a gyroscope to align itself--why would the Universe G' be any different. . .
The question seem to be is the Universe rotating or expanding. What mass or radiations are rotating is another question?
Huble's latest deep space stereo photos express indirectly toward rotation rather then expansion--- less there would be no free fall within the INS, and the spherical clusters of galaxies (in spherical vortexs like huricanes on the earth) are easly seen in Huble's photos.
Free fall being a demonstration of the equivalence principal--the feather and the ball falling at the same rate from the leaning tower of Piza-etc
The rotating Universe could qualify as the source of the equivalence principal. Of course the big bang follows the same concept-- in fact millions of them do. So does the Earth.
However the expansion or decay hypothesis--does not permit an equiivalence principal to exist on the space station.
This Univers's gravity G' is a complicated equation that no man will ever solve--it is a hypothesis only--not to be mistaken with the formula G on earth.
One's belief in a Big Bang that started it all--is ludicrous.
Let us not become a Luddite.
|