Science Forums 2

[jerrygg38]

Originally Posted by maddog

jerrygg38,

I have finally read this thread and excuse me if I give you that "Spock" look and say
"interesting...".

Your theory apparently at the root depends upon only two particles, one
a minutely small + charge and mass, the other with a minutely small - charge and mass. You make up a composite particle made up of one + and one - charged particle. With these you make all the known (and unknown-?) particles in the universe).

I can consider alternate theories as I often do. What problem I would have with this one, is how it can account for all the known interactions.

From what you have said, you account for the electron, proton, neutron.

e - composed of number of - dots to equal its charge.
p - composed of number of + dots to equal its charge.
n - composded of number of +- (composite) dots to equal its mass.

You mention a neutrino yet do not describe its composition.

You do not describe the what constitutes the following particles:

Muon, Positron (anti-particle of electron), Anti-Proton, Anti-neutrino.

I suppose due to the similarity of the electron with a muon
(same charge) that you just add some +- composite dots. Though what
do do with the anti-particles ?

I have not bothered to ask about quarks as your interpretations removes the need for SU(2)xSU(3) symmetry or Chromodynamics. I do wonder what you do with the other Baryons and Mesons that have been discovered
by the worlds current and past accelerators ?

I you don't consider the need for Antimatter then how do you explain the
interaction observed as Hydronium {} to emit gamma rays (highly energetic photons).

Second what force would hold the electrons or protons together given EM's nature to repel like charges ?

Third it appears you only have two forces EM & Gravity. So what holds nuclei together ?

In case you didn't ever learn the name of the professor you were thinking of, it was Dr Richard Feynman, inventor of QED (Quantum Electrodynamics).

How do you account for Electron Tunnelling and whole interaction of Semiconductors ?

How do you explain the Thompson 2-slit experiment for both light or electrons when emitting on single photon or electron per second ?

How do you explain what is going on in any material that can undergo superconduction ?

How do you explain Bose-Einstein Condensation ?

How do you explain Particle Entanglement or EPR Paradox ?

I also didn't know whether you consider the need for a Magnetic Monopole.

How do envision Gravity as a force behaving near the Planck Scale ?

How about the notion of Parity ? How do you make this work with only
two particles to make up things ?

What prevents a neutron from accepting one more + or - dot to deviate from a neutral particle.

What makes neutrinos so weakly interacting if they are actually made of + or - particles. Are the other WIMP like particles -- so as to explain Dark Matter ?

Given the from WMAP data, how do you account for the need for Einstein's Omega-0 or Dark Energy (or not) ?

How does fission and fusion work without the Weak or Strong Forces ?

How do you deal with De Broglie waves for the electron for example ?

I could keep going. I am more interested in finding/knawing on these first though.

Any good theory of merit deserves to meet a good challenge. This is what strengthens such a theory.

I am curious.

maddog

You ask a lot of good questions. I have just finished rewriting the theory for the third time. I do not answer all the questions in my manuscript. I am a retired Electrical Engineer and only certain things interested me such as the basic structure of the universe, the size and shape of the universe, the double slit experiment explanations, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, the U-Meson shower, the K-Mesons and 2182Me Lamba, the binding energy of the proton, the red shift, the Michelson Morley experiment, the proton and electron right after big bang, the structure of space so that positive and negative particles attract.ETc.

Slowly I will post these things. If you like a copy of the manuscript I will mail it to your free if you want or you can pay for postage and printing at $8. I only send the paper copy. (most people want to pay the printing and postage but I don't care since I have sent so many copies of my work free over the years. ( I am independently poor on social security) Email at
jerrygg38@nc.rr.com if desired.

Anyway to me antimatter is simple the electron being in the center and the proton being on the outside with the mass reversed. Thus my dots can produce either. In the lab energy turns into positrons and electrons. I am not concerned about those details since my dots do so much especially since I brought them into multi-dimensional dots similar to string theory> The radius of my dots is 2.15941E-29 meters now but was 1.59407E-37 meters at the time of big bang.

I will try to answer your questions soon. I guess the bests way is for me to print it out and answer off line. I am not really that good on the internet. So I don't know how to break apart a long post such as yours.