Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog
Bigger problem I see is with only two particles, opposite charges attract -- how do you keep particles appart. Keep Electron going around the Proton in a Hydrogen atom. If it all depends on EM alone this wouldn't work.
A form of Gauge Theory might work here. By allowing EM to change its "flavor" with distance. EM's group theoretic properties are as U(1) so all it can do is flip sign (from attractive to repulsive). Intensity is a scaling factor.
Still you have no Boson as force carriers. So how do you describe the Spin 1 characteristics of force particles. I guess the Spin 1/2 Fermion you are kinda' taking care of with the + and - particles.
Positron is not just and Proton in place where an Electron goes !
In all respects a Positron IS an Electron with an inverse sense of Time also
considered a change in Chirality. In a bubble chamber a Positron will spiral
the opposite way that an Electron does during a decay process.
As for that other theory mentioned, it had four flavors of one particle. Two were your +, - particles, third was your combined +- particle and the fourth was some weird thing that could become any one of the other three.
I am not quite as old as you are in that I am not yet retired. My background in the last 25+ years has been designing Software. My collegiate training was both Physics and Astrophysics and I realize your theory will have to consider High Energy interactions to account for what goes on in most Physics today. You don't get to dismiss it.
maddog
|
I just finished the manuscript and will send it to Library of Congress tomorrow.
Now I have time to answer your questions.(If you want a copy I would be happy to send it to you. No money necessary.
You ask how you keep the particles apart. The answer is I don't. The particles exist at 2.15941E-29 meters. A plus dot has a charge of 1.31144E-57 coulombs. When stationary it is a charge. A split second later it moves at light speed C and is a point magnetic source. A split second later it is a charge again. thus the plus dot continually changes from a point charge to a point magnetic source. The minus dot does the same thing for the negative.
These operate at different dimensions as per String theory type concepts.
When a plus charge and minus charge unite, they form a mass bipolar dot when stationary and a grav-photonic dot when moving at C. Again this change is continuous.
The moving electron has bipolar dots continually changing as it moves. Dots do not move continuously. They stop. They jump at light speed, then stop again. Thus the dots are particle-waves.
As far as the electron moving around the proton is concerned the basic equation of the universe is
Qd + (-Qd) <-------------> Md
Md = 7.33982E-69Kg. The above equation is a transformation equation. I used to believe it was an equals equations. However after thinking about string theory for the last few weeks, I completely changed my theory. Sadly after 27 years, my work changed three months ago. Now after the last few weeks things are making more sense to me. Although I am near 70 years, I have a mind which keeps generating alternate theories.
The worst thought I had was that in the near future I would find myself on morphine during my last few days. At that time, I would realize the errors in my work and I could do nothing about it. Well I am happy to say that although my work of 27 years has been destroyed by myself, I am not on morphine yet.
The worst thing was that my Doppler Space Time was destroyed two days ago. It isn't that my equations are destroyed. My explanations suck.
I have my dual brain to contend with. the concept portion cannot speak but comes up with great ideas. My audio/visual portion can speak and see but cannot often understand what the other half of my brain understands.
So I know the answers but cannot understand them.
On tests I used to write the answers first and then try to work them out. I was a terrible logic designer. I wrote out the designs and then checked them. I made little corrections and they worked well. But the regular designers could not understand how I could do that and I could not understand how they could do their work.
The big problem was when I had to explain to the customers how my designs worked. So Technical writers fudged some answers and everyone was happy. I just do things backwards.
Therefore to solve the universe I write down answers and then see how they work out. Then I try to explain them. This is especially hard when you really do not understand how they work and why.
So we look at the problem with the electron in the Bohr orbit. At the Bohr radius, the equations are:
F= K WQ Q /R^2 = Ma V^2 / R
where Ma = Mo / (1-(V/C)^2) ^0.5
The first equation is the standard balance of forces between two charges and the centrifugal force. The second equation is the Einsteinian relationship.
Notice most physics books of long ago did not look at the Einsteinian term.
When we calculate the mass increase at c/137.036 we find it to be
13.606EV. This is exactly the same as the ionization energy.
Unless you were taught differently, this has been overlooked. At least in my 1966 course. (I went 10 years at night).
Look what happens when the electron tries to reach the proton, the Einsteinian term becomes huge. Thus the electron cannot achieve the proton radius without the neutrino.
The other problem is the electrical energy to mass conversion formula. As the electron nears the proton, it loses charge.
Since 1 kilograms <-----------> 3.08302E11 coulombs,
1 electron volts transforms into 5.49598E-25 coulombs
Therefore Delta Charge = 3.73892E-24 coulombs and
Q = 1.60218E-19 -3.7892E-24 = 1.60214E-19 Coulombs
This is only 23.34 PPM of charge change.
The loss of charge and the increase of Einsteinian mass/energy prevents the electron from flowing into the proton.
