Quote:
Originally Posted by maddog
Still you have no Boson as force carriers. So how do you describe the Spin 1 characteristics of force particles. I guess the Spin 1/2 Fermion you are kinda' taking care of with the + and - particles.
Positron is not just and Proton in place where an Electron goes !
In all respects a Positron IS an Electron with an inverse sense of Time also
considered a change in Chirality. In a bubble chamber a Positron will spiral
the opposite way that an Electron does during a decay process.
As for that other theory mentioned, it had four flavors of one particle. Two were your +, - particles, third was your combined +- particle and the fourth was some weird thing that could become any one of the other three.
I am not quite as old as you are in that I am not yet retired. My background in the last 25+ years has been designing Software. My collegiate training was both Physics and Astrophysics and I realize your theory will have to consider High Energy interactions to account for what goes on in most Physics today. You don't get to dismiss it.
maddog
|
In my manuscript I speak of spin in terms only. This is a very difficult subject because I have so many different types of spins and I do not know how to calculate them. The electric dot-waves spin, the bipolar dot waves spin, the electron itself spins with its dot-waves, the body of the electron can spin at a different angle from the spin of the bipolar dot waves, the housing of the dot waves can spin at a different angle from the dot-waves themselves. Thus I have so many spins and it would take me 20 years to figure them out.
All I can do is leave the theory for others to figure out.
Yes the Positron is different than just a reversal of the electron/proton combination. The spins are most likely opposite but I do not understand enough about the dot-wave spins. After all my dot-waves are only 3 months old. I was happy with just dots until I looked at Brian Greene book. Then I was forced to look inside my dots.
As a single person I cannot rewrite all the equations of physics which developed over 100 years. All I can do is present the salient parts of the dot-wave theory for others to study and work on.
My dot-waves are quite flexible. Since a dot wave changes from particle to wave constantly, everything is a particle wave.
In effect parts of an electron materialize and dematerialize constantly. Thus Heisenbergy uncertainty principle is clear with the dot-wave theory. So is the Double slit experiment. Here are the dot-characteristisc
Dot........Velocity........Mass.........Charge.... ....Fields
Plus........0..................0.............+Qd.. .........DC fields
Minus.......0................0..............-Qd............DC fields
Bipolar......0................Md.............0.... ...........Grav. field
plus..........C...............0................+Qd ...........Magnetic
minus........C..............0................-Qd.............Magnetic
Bipolar.......C.............0..................0.. ............Grav &Photonic
Notice that my 2 dots have have six different properties. this is because within the radius of the dot, they all operate in different dimensions. I only realized this 3 weeks ago. For 27 years I thought I could build a universe with only 2 electrical dots. Then I started to rewrite my dot theory based upon the conversion of mass to charge rather than mass to charge times velocity C. Suddenly the same equations started to make sense.
So I failed to produce a viable theory in 27 years. I am glad I am not on morphine yet. My last upper biting tooth just broke yesterday. Now I need dentures. I guess I will be in the old age home soon with my tongue hanging out. I had good equations but for 27 years I did not understand the multi-dimensional dots. Thank God for the String mathematicians. the pictures in the book look funny. My dots are simplier. However without them I would not have the dot-charts.
Anyway happy Thanksgiving. Until my dentures arrive, I am left to chop meat and rice.
