Science Forums 2

[FRIPRO]

Originally Posted by Pluto

G'day

Fripro said



I do not have a problem of the parts within the universe rotating to some extent. We do have galaxies rotating in different directions and at the same time are part of a cluster of galaxies that rotate around a super cluster. The universe as a total being "ALL" cannot rotate. It would become quite complicated to see which super cluster rotates where.




That is the part that I do not agree with. Imagine your one side of the observable universe and your 27 billion on the other side and you have 0ver 100 billions of galaxies forming and popping up at the same time all over the place.

The king does not wear invisible robes.

I would only answer with in the many space photos of the deep Universe the Galaxies that you mention are at all different angles and distribution.

There are clusters of Galaxies and also the have a vortex design, as do the Huricanes in the Alantic ocean on Earth and on Jupiter's red spot, also Neptune has them and so does Saturn.

The deep space photos show interconnection of most of the galaxies. They are also visible in the stereo photos shown above URL by Modest. Color can not be dependent on the internet photos; but, doppler effect is valid for all wavelength coming and going thus the Universe's rotation is a valid Hypothesis.

It is a stronger Hypothesis than the Big Bang creating the Universe 13+billion light years ago. Which I will never accept as valid.



It seem to be a pattern for vortex arrangement of hurricane like galaxies at all levels of the cosmos.

The different angles of the galactic clusters in the deep space photos, also give credit to a rotating Universe.

Very similar to the Hurricanes that are on the Earths ocean's surface. If the Earth were transparent we could see similar construction. Of course the Earth rotates? So does our Milkey Way galaxy

.