Quote:
Originally Posted by Buffy
What about other galaxies? Are you saying that all galaxies should be the same size as ours or they are otherwise inherently unstable?
Are you saying that the Conservation Laws are wrong? Can you discuss this in more detail?
By the sacred radiance of the sun, the mysteries of Hecate, and the night; by all the operation of the orbs from whom we do exist, and cease to be, 
Buffy |
When the billion big bangs occur, there is a distribution of energy around the universe. The process involves random chance. Therefore some galaxies will be much larger than others, some will have much more mass, some will be independent, others will be dependent. Many will be similar to ours. there is no control over the process.
As far as the conservation laws are concerned, we produce laws based upon what we observe and measure. The universe at the present time is an old universe in which most of the action occurred long ago. At the big bang, the forming protons and electrons had huge masses but were equal in size. Therefore at least half of the electrons mass/energy radiated away in the last 15 billion years. This would account for much of the dark matter which really is my dot-waves in space. Space is full of dot waves and we live in a space filled with dots similar to the general gas laws. Except the rules are different because the dots are either stationary (mass dots) or moving at light speed C (photonic dots). There is no difference between these dots. It only depends upon which dimensions they exist in.
Thus the conservation of mass/energy is true but this refers to the total mass.energy of the universe including all the dark mass/energy. Most likely at the big bang, even more mass/energy radiated away. Some people believe that there is 4 times as much dark matter as our matter. That seems okay to me.
As far as the conservation of momentum, that is correct when all the momentums are considered. Linear momentum can convert into orbital mommentum at the dot wave level. For example an electron beam moving upon a target experiences continuous quantized motion. Each dot stops every split second and then restarts at light speed. When it stops its linear momentum changes into orbital momentum. Then it goes again and its orbital momentum changes back into linear momentum. However these is no guarantee which direction it will be . Thus the magnitude of the momentum is concerved on the dot level but its angle is not.
this is the reason for the Heisenberg Uncertaintly principle. Quantum mechanics makes the error of believing in a multi-dimensional universe which operates on the large scale. They are true at the small scale. It is possible for an electron to have synchronized mass/energy conversions such that all the dots are photonic dots at the same time. Then the electron could completely dematerialize and rematerialize on the moon a few second later. However the probability of such an occurrenece is basically zero.
On the small scale, the electron produces a wide spot on a screen.
The important thing is that the concerservation of momentum is really
Linear Momentum plus orbital momentum = Constant
When you take large objects, the probability is such that most of the time the object will move in a straight line. Since there are 2.28198E41 mass/photonic dots in a proton, most of the time, most of the dots will reemerge in a straight line. In addition as the object moves only some dots change from mass dots to photonic dots every split second at a time. Therefore an object moving in straight line motion tends to continue moving in a straight line.
Thus for all practical purposes on a large scale
Linear Momentum= Constant
Orbital momentum = constant
It is unfortunate that we produce laws which are only partially true and which degrade the thinking of man. I reject all laws until I can fully understand them. Thus for 27 years I have not let myself be limited by any laws such as light speed being constant or that only our light speed is available within our space time. In general the light speed depends upon the density of dots in space. The more dots per cubic meter, the lower the light speed.
If we do not think outside the box of our taught limitations, how can we move forward?
