One can select data to fit a model, but analyses such as that coordinated by organizations such as
the WMO and
NASA GISS are reviewed to detect and reject these and other intentional and unintentional methodological errors. Further, much of their primary datasets are publicly available for analysis by anybody. I’m unaware of any statistically valid analysis supporting the claim of a widespread sampling bias among climatolgists in general. By you own admission, ED, easily verified by visiting the referenced webpage, you have not done this, but rather relabeled the graphics from the
wikipedia article “global warming” and other sources. Your data is not actually from thermometer measurements recorded personally by you, doesn’t agree with public sources such as the NASA GISS station data for
Toledo/Expres, or, I’m fairly certain, contain any actual data about bikinis from Wal-Mart, or women wearing them.
In short, you’ve written a bit of humorous satirical fiction, admitted to it, then, oddly, claimed that it’s not fictional. I fail to see how this serves to do anything but confuse serious discussion about climatology.
