G'day Buffy
I must thank you for your kind response. I cannot answer all, but in due time, maybe.
You said
Quote:
|
It's quite obvious that you do read quite a bit on the topic, including the data, but what I'm asking you to do here is actually *think* about what the theories and data *mean*.
|
I agree with you with respect to the theories and the meaning of the data. I try to do that, but there are strong points and different theories.
Quote:
|
Oh and you failed to address the very question I posed in what you quoted, dear!
|
I will adress the point in due time.
I have the flu and my mind is fogged up.
Quote:
|
All points! That's the strange thing about expansion: no center point! So a question back to you: do you think there needs to be? Why?
|
I agree no centre point.
The part that I do not agree with is that expansion does not occur throughout the universe.
When we look at the evolution and form of galaxies we see different stages of contraction and expansion that is related to the so called black hole mass and activity.
Quote:
|
Think about it: to us it does look like we are in the exact center of the universe. What do you think the odds are of that being the case?
|
Zero.
Quote:
|
Expansion proceeds from everywhere and is thus cumulative over distance: but the point is that it's not "pushing" anything, and thus, over the space of a galactic cluster, not only is its effect not terribly large, it doesn't matter so far as the gravitational effect that the constituent galaxies have on each other.
|
I agree
Quote:
|
This unfortunately does not reflect positively on the weight of your arguments.
|
At this moment my aim is to understand.
I have been given a topic to read with a few papers on the Radiation escaping from black holes.
I should have taken up tennis
