Quote:
Originally Posted by REASON
Your position throughout the entirety of this thread has been that the Big Bang Theory is WRONG, and you have been attempting to refute it in every way you can conceive. You have established this anti-Big Bang position for reasons you have yet to reveal, in my opinion. You have expressed utter contemp for the theory to a point beyond objectivity and seem to imply that those who currently subscribe to it are foolhearty suckers. It is obvious that you are not going to allow yourself to be placed in that category.
|
I have got to say Reason that you have "hit the nail on the head". This whole post of yours Completely expresses what "discussion" that I have had with Pluto and my continual frustration thereof.
Some things I might add though are the following:
1. I have noticed that Pluto would not answer a direct question yet would provide
a link that not only didn't answer (it may have went off in a completely different
direction!).
2. A common response from Pluto to me was often to say I might not even
understand the question/topic (like the time he did a few posts ago to Modest).
3. Another method I notice Pluto would was the typical deflection method of
asking another different question than answer the one being asked.
I have read more half of the papers that Pluto flung my direction in response to
on my question. None of them were ever directly related to my question to him.
His often response was something like "I post these links because they say it
better than I can...".
I was not aware that Pluto is now hung on Jets from Black Holes. We are not able
to be near the vicinity of one of these objects. Though models have been done
on them. Every paper I read on the subject were jets to form would be outside
the Event Horizon so no problem of coming "out" as Modest was concerned
about. Now if Pluto can not get his head around that, I am Not sympathetic.
maddog
