Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
If the BBT is correct than the biggest problem that it cannot explain is the formation of the super cluster of cluster of local galaxies where in the centre lives a monster so called black hole that has jets ejecting matter far greater than the matter accreting to the black hole.
|
Unsupported -- not true - unfounded -- Just conjecture on your part.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
Where does this matter come from? There is no magic in this.
|
Basically has been said before in the last couple of posts, including mine.
Best method I can think of would be Hawking Radiation around a fast rotating
Black Hole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pluto
But! Please do not expect me to agree with the BBT just because some person becomes emotional.
|
That would be my last consideration. I do not even expect you to "agree' with BBT.
I would also like to be afforded the same consideration and "not" to be forced feed the bilge you provide.
As you have not provided a method to your "cycling" in your thinking. I pretty
much reject it "out of hand".
I am "open" minded, though I do use logic and can follow details. None of which
you have provided. Every time I say BBT is the prevailing Theory -- you say,
"How mainstream", or something.
I think the only place where we might agree is I think some Cosmologists are taking how early they can get to near the beginning by using theories themselves (such as String Theory and SuperGravity, etc) which have all not been corroborated. I think we have a good description of what happens to before
CMBR. You can conjecture before that to a point -- as far as QCD can take you.
Before that is a bit like Alice in Wonderland or Fairyland. So I set my limit of
knowledge at about 1 microsecond after beginning. I make no presumption
before that. Now this is what I think.
You Pluto are free to think what you will.
maddog
