|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: My belief in Global Warming is getting shaky
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Binghi
Thats interesting.... Hmmm, I wonder what happens to excess CO2 trapped under the Artic ice ?
Aparently there are some very big undersea volcanoes under the Artic ice cap, and some big bangs of late (has been covered in other threads)
Massive amounts of CO2 released - where did it go ? absorbed by the sea water ?
(extract)
During the first half of 1999, a long-lived volcanic-spreading event occurred on the ultraslow-spreading Gakkel Ridge in the Arctic Ocean. The seismicity associated with this event was unprecedented in duration and magnitude for a seafloor eruption.
Perhaps the closest analogue to the Gakkel event would be the 1783 Laki fissure eruption in Iceland, which produced 14 km3 of lava over about 8 months of seismic activity covering a section 27 km long...
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~tolsto...toy_Gakkel.pdf
(extract)
...data demonstrate that eruptions along the (Gakkel) ridge are larger and more frequent than previously theorized.
G. Michael Purdy, director of Lamont-Doherty, said, "A recent eruption on such a slow spreading ridge reaffirms the fact that we live in an era of discovery in ocean sciences. There remains much that is unknown, and even more that is not understood about the sea floor of our own planet
News Archive - The Earth Institute at Columbia University
And a map - Earthquake record, Artic area
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/avetiso...es/avfig06.gif
Map from here - Seismic Arctic Earthquakes G.P. Avetisov.
|
If you were trying to make a point, it was lost on me.
Sure, there are natural sources of CO2. There's also human induced CO2.
Are you arguing that climate change is occurring regardless of human impact?
----------------
Hypography Science Forums Moderator
---
"There are no passengers on Spaceship Earth. We are all crew." - Marshall McLuhan
"We must not forget that when radium was discovered no one knew that it would prove useful in hospitals. The work was one of pure science. And this is a proof that scientific work must not be considered from the point of view of the direct usefulness of it." - Marie Curie
|