Science Forums 2

[modest]

That's fascinating. I wonder if such a generalization has been tried before.

Originally Posted by CraigD

Is there any such that and ? Fermat’s Last Theorem states that there is not for . Is there some for which a “generalized FLT” is false?

I checked m=3, n=4 , , = {1-100} and I'm currently running through m=4, n=5, ... = {1-100} with nothing found so far.

Very exciting

~modest