Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Blazys
Now, if you do a "Google search" on "Diophantine equations fourth powers", then you will find the solution that I posted, and many other solutions as well!
|
Indeed!
From such a search hit,
Diophantine Equation--4th Powers -- from Wolfram MathWorld, comes:
Let the notation p.m.n stand for the equation consisting of a sum of m pth powers being equal to a sum of n pth powers. In 1772, Euler proposed that the 4.1.3 equation

had no solutions in integers (Lander et al. 1967). This assertion is known as the Euler quartic conjecture.
So there’s a recognized shorthand notation, “p.m.n”, for equations like

(which would be n.1.m or n.m.1 in the shorthand), and 135 years after Fermat, 237 years before this thread, Euler at least conjectured that the answer to one of post #1’s questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD
3. Is there any  such that and  ?
|
is “no” for the special case of n.1.m, 4.1.3.
From the same mathworld article:
However, the Euler quartic conjecture was disproved in 1987 by N. Elkies, who, using a geometric construction, found

and showed that infinitely many solutions existed (Guy 1994, p. 140). In 1988, Roger Frye found

and proved that there are no solutions in smaller integers (Guy 1994, p. 140).
So, in disproving Euler’s quartic conjecture, Elkies answered post #1’s question 3 “yes”, 22 years ago.
My “how did you do that?” question (
post #7), however, has merely been deflected from “how did
you do that?” to “how did
he or she do it?", and the search for an answer to
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD
4. Is there a computationally efficient way to generate examples for a given and ?
|
remains very much still afoot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle
|
Maybe. :Shrug: There are a lot of tracks in sight. Which ones are right … well, that’s the rub.

----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
