Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 03-13-2009   #1 (permalink)
Michaelangelica's Avatar
Michaelangelica
Creating


Location:
North of Sydney Australia
 
Michaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond reputeMichaelangelica has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Smile Science Teaching. What's wrong with it?

A press release
Mobile phone risks clouded in science


People are confused and apathetic about mobile phone radiation, and the situation can be partly traced back to science classrooms, says Clare Christensen, a recent PhD graduate from Queensland University of Technology.


"Science is supposed to be about certainty - at least that's what they tell us in school - but people are seeing media reports with scientists disagreeing over things such as the possible health risks with mobile phones,'' Dr Christensen said.

"There is a cynicism that develops when people see scientists as having different 'opinions', but of course it's not about opinion. Scientists are always disagreeing - always have and probably always will."

Dr Christensen talked with people aged 18 to 26 about their mobile phones and how they saw the possible risks in the light of contradictory news reports.

In focus group discussions, they initially talked about how useful mobile phones were but this changed when they were shown a media report on two Australian studies.

The first found double the rate of cancer in mice exposed to mobile phone radiation and the second found no change in cancer rates among exposed mice.

"Social networking and peer pressure issues outweighed health issues because the scientific evidence is seen as contradictory and uncertain," Dr Christensen said.

"The news media are not giving us very much information on how the research is set up and why the findings from one study differ markedly from another.

"At the same time, it seems people aren't in a hurry to find out for themselves. They could do an internet search to gather information, but they simply don't. The search would not yield a definitive answer but they would at least be more aware of the risks."

Dr Christensen said a greater emphasis on discussion and realistic inquiry work in schools would likely lead to a genuine interest in the science of issues such as mobile phone radiation, global warming, cloning, medical procedures and genetically modified foods.


"Very few people I spoke to had discussed contemporary issues of science in the classroom,'' she said.

"The trouble is, we're not conditioned to discuss science at school.
It's an authoritarian model with this over-riding preoccupation with getting the right answers."


Media contact
- Sandra Hutchinson, QUT media officer
QUT | News

Quote:
My kids' senior science book was a disgrace. It stared by looking at scientific method in all its boring detail. They were both put off science from day one.

I started my love of science by blowing up things and my teacher crushing a tin can right in front of me! Wow! How did he do that with a Bunsen burner and a bit of water?!

Star wars exhibit has come to Sydney Power House Museum of technology.
Wow! off to see that next week!-MA


----------------
"Unemployment is capitalism's way of getting you to plant a garden."
~Orson Scott Card

Last edited by Michaelangelica; 03-13-2009 at 04:32 AM..
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:09 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network