|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Halting Proof Fails
this is like a 1/4 of an idea... can you please expand on your first post with the following:
firstly, provide the basis of what lead you to look at this, otherwise why would it interest us? and posts that dont interest don't get replies you are perhaps looking to get.
secondly, explain halting to people who may not know what it is, this is, after all, a public forum where people come to learn and participate and get ideas or answers...
lastly, you say "source of derived contradiction"... what contradiction? this is something that should probably be covered in the pre/intro, but still, consider structuring your post closer to an essay (intro paragraph, or sentence or something, some words describing your problem/delema, introduce the concept, ask questions, post oppinion, close out with some thoughts or more questions), it makes for an easier read, better interest into researching the matter and all around a better discussion.
P.S. don't take me as a prick, and i do what you did in your post all the time, problem is, over time i have developed an understanding of better or worse ways of asking/discussing and creating posts that draw people into conversation, rather then confuse the living hell out of them and make them simply not care, which, as you may imagine, translates into no replies and your frustration with the user base for not helping you get a fresh view point, or bring to your eyes some evidence that you did not consider before.
----------------
Microsoft, the leader in using innovative tactics to promote irksome experience, coupled with antiquated technology that's held together by a pyramid of makeshift afterthoughts.
Apple, the leader in using irksome tactics to promote innovative experience, coupled with an antiquated core that's enhanced by state-of-the-art afterthoughts.
Linux, the leader in not using any tactics to promote user-defined experience, coupled with state-of-the-art core enhanced by innovative afterthoughts.
 |
