Quote:
Originally Posted by Hasanuddin
Also, the fact that I just learned about the antimatter cloud does not diminish the fact that the model deductively predicted its existence in the absence of personal knowledge of it.
|
No, I’m sure it doesn’t. But you can’t expect that kind of personal discovery to validate your model to the scientific community at large.... which.... unless I'm mistaken, is the goal.
Understand, if your model is successful, it will completely supplant 80 years of cosmology—overturning standard cosmology and rewriting the scientific understanding of the makeup of the universe. In order to do this you are going to need (at the very least) a quantitative model that works at least as well as the
concordance model. I’m not making this up and I’m not saying it to be mean... it’s just the reality of the situation. It would be just as true whether or not I was telling it to you.
So that is a goal. That should be where you want to get your model so that professional cosmologists will take it seriously as a valid description of the universe. Of course, you don’t need to reach that goal in order to talk about your idea on this forum. I personally would be more than willing to investigate your idea and help you develop its physics. But, so far it doesn’t seem like we’ve been able to talk about your model as much as argue about the scientific method.
~modest
