|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: Bang/Crunch Revisited
WOW! I just got another "infraction" for telling the truth about my firsthand lifelong experience of GNOSIS.
I probably will soon be banned. If science can not even let a mystic/gnostic speak his truth...
And I always add the disclaimer that this source of knowing (the omnipresent NOW in this case) is not presented as "science."
Maybe if my every comment acknowledging this gnosis were posted in the theology forum...
Like... not allowed to say this here, so here is the link to the proper forum....
Quite an inconvenience... and seems absurd... but scientists disdain mystics, and they have the "power over' here to ban us at their whim... or as violating the rules against honest expression of gnostic knowing.
I can see the trend here. I don't even know hoe many "infractions" a guy gets before he is banned. I've lost count. If anyone has anything besides smart ass remarks, this is probably the time for serious science. Mostly my whole life this IQ thing has made people use whatever "credentials" they have to get the upper hand and try to "slay me."
this place is no different. One in ten million. Am I lying? Does the guy who accused me of lying get an "infraction."
I'll tune in tomorrow to find out. Waht a drama.
Waht about serious cosmology. The old Bang/Crunch is not dead yet, and my intention in this thread is to make an *intelligent argument* to resurrect it from the dumpster designated by the 'expanding space' theorists.
Michael
Michael
Last edited by Michael Mooney; 04-27-2009 at 09:55 PM..
|