Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-06-2009   #19 (permalink)
maddog's Avatar
maddog
Creating


Location:
Akron, OH
 
maddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud ofmaddog has much to be proud of
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Talking Re: Bang/Crunch Revisited

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mooney View Post
WOW! I just got another "infraction" for telling the truth about my firsthand lifelong experience of GNOSIS.
I probably will soon be banned. If science can not even let a mystic/gnostic speak his truth...
I doubt the infraction was from your claim of a personal Gnostic Experience. Usually
infractions are from "not following rules", or personally attacking someone. However,
Michael the moderators have maybe added one just for 'you' -- that is your Cosmic
level Arrogance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mooney View Post
And I always add the disclaimer that this source of knowing (the omnipresent NOW in this case) is not presented as "science."
Maybe if my every comment acknowledging this gnosis were posted in the theology forum...
Like... not allowed to say this here, so here is the link to the proper forum....
That might be true. Gnosticism can be construed as a Religious experience, that would
put it in Theology.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mooney View Post
Quite an inconvenience... and seems absurd... but scientists disdain mystics, and they have the "power over' here to ban us at their whim... or as violating the rules against honest expression of gnostic knowing.
I wouldn't think "Science" has disdain of Mysticism per se. Just unfounded claims or
something on the order of "I was abducted by Aliens". Not very credible in a science
forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mooney View Post
I can see the trend here. I don't even know hoe many "infractions" a guy gets before he is banned. I've lost count. If anyone has anything besides smart ass remarks, this is probably the time for serious science. Mostly my whole life this IQ thing has made people use whatever "credentials" they have to get the upper hand and try to "slay me."
this place is no different. One in ten million. Am I lying? Does the guy who accused me of lying get an "infraction."
I'll tune in tomorrow to find out. Waht a drama.
Oh, there goes the Arrogance meter again. Really ... How do you keep that Ego in
check ? And you profess to be a Psychologist.... I wonder what your patients think of
you... Or do you even have a practice anymore.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Mooney View Post
Waht about serious cosmology. The old Bang/Crunch is not dead yet, and my intention in this thread is to make an *intelligent argument* to resurrect it from the dumpster designated by the 'expanding space' theorists.
Biggest hurdle I think is how to explain evidence from WMAP and other CMBR satellite
data.

maddog

Last edited by maddog; 05-06-2009 at 10:31 AM.. Reason: Fixed a Typo...
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:50 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network