Move 10
In move 9, it was put forward that underrepresented antimatter micelles would be purged from all embryonic matter-based galaxies (like the Milky Way), while an equivalent mirror process would occur in antimatter-based galaxies. The purged material would be expected to be comprised of both micelles that had been collapsed to a black-hole state (AMBH) and one’s that were not collapsed. Also, this process would begin as soon as conditions of immiscibility were established (actually, it follows that this process of purging is simply a continuation of the self-organization process of “self-assembly” that had led to immiscibility.) Simultaneously mirror purging of micellular matter would be occurring from antimatter-based galaxies. Concurrently gravitational repulsion between galaxies caused a condition of hyperexpansion. Therefore material that was being purged from All galaxies would be deposited on the ever-expanding fabric of space-time in a similar manner throughout the Universe. The resulting consequence of these conclusions would be a smearing effect of purged material across the expanding space-time. Because this same effect would be occurring from all developing galaxies concurrently and in similar fashion, the net effect would be a near uniform smearing of both antimatter (purged from galaxies like our own) and matter (from antimatter-based galaxies.) Because this material was all similarly smeared onto the fabric of space-time, one would expect the physical conditions (temperature, density, etc) of this purged material to be relatively uniform across the entire Universe.
As the Universe continues its increase in the acceleration of expansion, the near uniformly deposited material will cool at roughly the same rate. Therefore, the magic temperature of 3000ºK would be reached throughout this purged material at the same time. This is important because below this temperature, protons and electrons will begin to couple and form the first atoms of hydrogen, and as a result release the first light of the Universe. Hence the “cosmic microwave background” (CMB)
This is true of all the
purged material. The galaxy cores, themselves, would be expected to be “hotter” than 3000ºK at the time of CMB because of the fact that material in the galactic core was not smeared onto the fabric of space-time. Therefore at the moment of the CMB, all the galactic clusters of the Universe would not be emitting any light.
The obvious question becomes, why aren’t there a bunch of black empty spots in the CMB data where all of the different galaxies are? To answer that question, one must consider exactly what the CMB is. We are so used to looking up in the sky and seeing billions of galaxies at once, that the following definition may, at first, be confusing. When we analyze the CMB, we are actually seeing a razor-thin spherical shaped glimpse of the Universe, where Earth is at the center of that sphere. The reason is simple, all of the photons that we might view on a particular day
must have been traveling for the same exact amount of time, and assuming a constant speed of light, therefore they all traveled the same distance radiating inward to Earth forming a sphere. Best estimates of the CMB put its occurrence roughly one hundred thousand Earth-years after the Big Bang—all the while the Universe has been expanding extremely rapidly. Therefore, by the moment in time that the CMB occurred, the distances between galaxies had already become immense. Therefore, the likelihood of a galactic cluster being exactly the correct distance away from the Earth to match the distance traveled by the photons of the CMB is very slight…though the probability would exist.
Now, let us assume a galactic cluster did/does exist at exactly the correct distance away from the Earth that it matches the distance traveled by the photons of the CMB, how would that affect the resulting data collected on Earth of that galaxy. Conclusion: it would appear as a blank and empty spot in the CMB data that will appear much larger in size than an actual galaxy would today. The “blankness” of the galactic center is caused by the fact that galactic kernels would be denser and retaining heat longer than purged micellular material as discussed in the 3rd paragraph of this post. The reason why one would expect the blank-hole in the data to be “much larger” than what caused the blank data spot comes from observations and understandings of other systems that undergo expansion. Consider either a bicycle tire or bubblegum. In either case, if a pinprick is made in a wall of the expanding “thing” then as the entire system expands so too does the size of the hole. Once the system becomes fully inflated the once tiny hole will appear much larger than one might predict (w/out having seen this phenomenon occur beforehand.) Check to nature: an apparent exact match. See the following link:
Astronomers Find Enormous Hole in the Universe
**Note: this particular prediction and observation are not part of my published book, “The Dominium.” Rather Move #10 is the direct result of the debate that occurred last year on the Scientific American community forum with a man from FermiLab’s Tevatron complex who went by the screen-name, “MrSheepish.” The prediction of the possibility of such a rare and large blank spot in the CMB data was made as a deductive conclusion of the Dominium model/premises
before I personally was aware of the existence of such data. *In a similar manner that the Dominium predicted the necessary existence of the MAC antimatter cloud surrounding our galaxy’s AGN
before conclusive evidence was published by ESA/NASA reported mapping such a structure
NASA - Vast Cloud of Antimatter Traced to Binary Stars Two times now, the Dominium model has made blind deductive assertions only to be later verified by concrete empirical evidence from the scientific record.
The question becomes, how long can this model be ignored? How much proof is sufficient? How many of the evidentiary anomalies need to be given explanation before people stop mulling the traditional dead-ends and begin considering the potentials offered by this beautiful, clean, and seductive model?
Again, the call is placed on the silent and passive readers of this thread. Currently, millions, if not billions, of dollars are being spent funding studies that possess central hopes of verifying one or more of the traditional, yet unverified, assumptions that the Dominium seeks to overturn. Yet, aside from AEGIS, no money appears to be funding projects that could confirm this new, much more encompassing, and seamless model. At a time of global recession, how can we afford to continue stagnant status-quo thinking?
This new model opens the doors on several new avenues of study and human advancement. Unfortunately, a new model also means closing the doors on passages that have led nowhere and are proven dead-ends. If the new model is correct, some superfluous projects will necessarily need to stop, resulting in temporary loss of employment for some. On the other hand, the new opportunities offered by the newly opened avenues will mean rapid advancements for both scientific understandings and for individual scientists agile and nimble enough to adapt. (Personally, I feeling the greatest discoveries will come if man can produce AMBH.) But in order for this type of change to occur, people MUST know of the new model and how/why it is superior to stale status-quo popular-bias assumptions. It is dangerous to stop questioning assumptions. Therefore, it is imperative that as many high-powered individuals get directed to these threads as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation. In the meantime, stay tuned, there’s more to come.
