Go Back   Science Forums
Thread: Wolfram Alpha
View Single Post
Old 05-18-2009   #3 (permalink)
CraigD's Avatar
CraigD
Creating


Location:
Silver Spring, MD, USA
 
CraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond reputeCraigD has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Thumbs up Promising, but lots of room for improvement

Being a big fan of Stephen Wolfram (he’s at or close to the top of my “people I wish I was” list), I’ve been looking forward to wolframalpha, or practically any other tool he comes up with.

That said, I see the point of critics who’ve said it could have used a lot more work before a wide public release. Capacity and availability appears to have been poorly planned, as much of the weekend, I got “unavailable – no connections available” from it. As best I can tell, it works pretty well if you’re willing to work with it, and educate yourself in its various ways of replying, which are sometimes awesomely clear, other times pretty much straight Mathematica, and frequently bizarre guesses at what you were trying to ask.

A couple examples I tried were “solve V = 4*pi/3*((r+d)^3 -r^3) for d”, how thick a spherical shell of a given outer radius must be to have a given volume, which I’d just solved myself in about 15 minutes using old-fashioned human algebra. It took a few seconds, and (clicking on “show steps”), is as clearly explained as by a good teacher. Cranking it up 4 dimensions to a 7-sphere, “solve V = 2*pi/315*((r+d)^7 -r^7) for d” returns output saying, to people who know Mathematica “use a numeric approximation”, which is fine if you know Mathematica and that there’re no general solutions to degree 7 polynomials, but pretty opaque if you don’t. Slip up slightly in your notation, and you’ll get weird results, ie: “solve V = k((r+d)^7 -r^7) for d”.

Try “Schwarzschild radius”, and it give you an equation and a nifty calculator to input masses into, but no handy reference of common masses to try – nice, but not superb.

It responds neatly to a simple “how are you?”, but lacks the pre-programmed pith of the ca 2000 “Jeeves” version of ask.com, which would reply to question like “are you gay?” with “none of your business”, “I prefer the term ‘jovial’”, or “sometimes silence is the best answer”.

In short, wolframalpha show promise, and I’d be fascinated to know how it’s working, but I don’t think in its present form it’ll steal much traffic from google, hyperphysics, or wikikpedia.


----------------
Moderator: Computers and Technology; Medical Science; Science Projects and Homework; Philosophy of Science; Physics and Mathematics; Environmental Studies
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:58 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network