Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2009   #22 (permalink)
Turtle's Avatar
Turtle
Percipient


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Thumbs up Re: The simple mechanics

Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigD View Post
The mechanics of this kind of problem – fundamentally, a work problem - are pretty simple.

The energy available in a 1 kg mass at a height of 0.1 m is about W = 1 \,\mbox{kg} \cdot 9.8 \,\mbox{m/s/s} \cdot 0.1 \,\mbox{m} = 0.98 \,\mbox{J}

This must equal the work of the car moving distance d with a force of friction f, so W = d \cdot f.

Rearranging, d = \frac{W}{f}

So, if we measure the rolling resistance of the loaded car – say by pulling it with a scale – and the mechanical resistance of its various pulleys – a tougher measurement, but in principle doable with scales – add them together to get the total resistance f, and divide our 0.98 J energy by it, we get the distance it should travel.

For example, if the total resistance is 0.1 N, we expect it to travel about 9.8 m.

Notice that how fast it goes, or how much of the distance it coasts after the weight has dropped its full distance, doesn’t effect the total distance traveled, except that f is likely to be higher for higher rolling speeds, and less when coasting (the pulleys etc. won’t be contributing as much drag then). It also doesn’t matter how the car converts the gravitational potential energy of the weight into work for moving the car, except that some schemes will have more or less friction than others, affecting f.

Also notice that, as f won’t be truely constant, a more precise calculation would be more complicated. However, with most low-speed, every-day smooth-surface rolling machines, rolling resistance is nearly constant regardless of speed, so the simple calculation above is likely to be adequate.
I recall the instructions the student posted here commented that the "best" cars go about 10 m; guess we shoulda got a clue eh!?. So much for my cone axle as an advantage for this project.

So we really have an engineering problem in the reduction of friction. Back to lube then, and in addition, care in precisely aligning the wheels on the axles and the axles on the vehicle so they run true and don't wobble around adding friction.
Maybe having the weight on a teeter-totter instead of using a pulley, and an axle string on the other end of the teeter-totter would attach to the drive axle and take out the friction in the system of a string on a pulley? Plus, a teeter-totter would remove the problem of the weight swinging.

One thing I'd like to see on these project threads, is a follow up from the student posters after the project is completed. What worked? What didn't work? Did you use any infomation other posters provided? What would you do different if you had it to do again?

That's a wrap.


----------------
semantics is not always just pedantic quibbling. ~ douglas r. hofstadter
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network