Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 05-20-2009   #28 (permalink)
arkain101's Avatar
arkain101
Creating


 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Fourth dimension=time?

Quote:
Sometimes, I dont really know what I am doing..and that is the point! (like that story)

I find after studying and acquiring more knowlege and levels of understanding, it is a very insightful method to do a practice where I behave as though I know nothing, and examine things from the bottom up / the absolutely as basic as possible scenario, and find my way back towards my peak of understanding.

This type of review, I find, cleans out bugs in our understanding matrix network of sorts.

The post above is not intended to prove a point. It is a breaking down of concepts, and is intended as a practice for an individual to build on their foundations.

What a person gets out of such a practice, entirely depends on any kinks they have along the way, that get straightened out.



This method if you will, was exactly the process I used in my cosmology thread.

I broke down cosmology to almost mind numbly stupid levels, and arrived at interesting conclusions. I did not intend to prove anything new, or explain anything that had not been explained. I simply shared this practice.

One of these conclusions which I thought was very interesting was where I arrived at a possible prediction quarks, which I equated as the most basic forms of interaction/reason.

Here is the total possible behaviors in a observation system. I noted that there appeared to be, as far as my knowledge goes,exactly the same number of quark combinations as there was possible different types of freedom interaction.

{frame A} = [frame B]

{ + => - } = [ - => 0 ] (deflection)
{ + => 0 } = [ 0 => + ] (deflection)
{ + => - } = [ - => - ] (bond)
{ + => 0 } = [ - => 0 ] (bond)
{ + => - } = [ 0 => - ] (false)

{ - => + } = [ + => 0 ] (deflection)
{ - => 0 } = [ 0 => - ] (deflection)
{ - => + } = [ + => + ] (bond)
{ - => 0 } = [ + => 0 ] (bond)
{ - => + } = [ 0 => + ] (false)

{ 0 => + } = [ + => 0 ] (deflection)
{ 0 => - } = [ - => 0 ] (deflection)
{ 0 => + } = [ + => + ] (bond)
{ 0 => - } = [ - => - ] (bond)
{ 0 => - } = [ 0 => 0 ] (false)
{ 0 => + } = [ 0 => 0 ] (false)


----------------
When you go, you may take nothing with you except that which can be held in your heart. Fill it wisely.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:08 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network