Science Forums 2

[AnssiH]

It is quite late when writing this, but I just wanted to give a quick sign of life here. I have read through the OP and my first reaction was that it seems to make perfect sense, and appears to reach - at least in my mind - quite expected conclusions. Many times, I would have expected that the relationships between isotropic C <-> simultaneity <-> geometry should be clear to everyone at least to the extent of being able to see how changing one definition (or call them postulates) affects the others, but I guess I've been proven wrong on that one many times :I

I also skimmed the responses and indeed seems like most of the reactions are based on little bit poor understanding of where the fundamental equation came from... That's a bit unfortunate but I guess it suffices that people then take that result on faith at first... :I

Anyway, as was the case with Schrödinger, I should still walk through the math in detail, to get an exactly proper view. And once again I will need help with that, so I'll try to get around to ask some questions...

But for now have to hit the sack,
-Anssi