|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: An Alternative to a singularity?
The problem may not be with time but with the relativistic concept of a space-time dimension.
We agree that One of the most persistent observations regarding time is that it is not perceive as matter or space but as an irreversible physical, chemical, and biological change in physical space.
Why then do physicist's assume that it can interact with the physical properties of space when there is no observational evidence for that assumption.
Defining time only in terms of a measure of the sequential ordering of the causality of an event would provide an unambiguous definition of time that is more consistent with both physical and mathematical observations than defining it in terms of the physical properties of a dimension.
Source: the Imagineer's Chronicles
Last edited by Jeffocal; 06-02-2009 at 05:46 AM..
|