Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 06-02-2009   #15 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
modest
Creating


Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: An Alternative to a singularity?

Jeff, I'm sorry, I've been moving through this thread on autopilot. I've been saying that gravitational time dilation is greater or less depending on the "strength of the field". That's not true at all. It is directly proportional to gravitational potential regardless of field strength.

The force of gravity is change in potential. If you're in an area of space where potential changes quickly then a person will feel a large gravitational force. As a person gets farther away from a mass the gravitational potential and the field strength both change, but it is most certainly the value of potential which determines time dilation.

It was probably very confusing that I mixed those up. I see now what you were saying that a person in the center of the mass would feel no gravitational force—the field strength would be zero while the field strength would be very large on the surface. If time dilation were a function of field strength then you'd most certainly be correct in your conclusions.

But, time dilation is a function of gravitational potential and the person at the center of the star has greater potential [where potential (U) is considered positive] than the person on the surface. The farther from the center of the star, the less the potential and the slower clocks run. EDIT: "...the faster they run." I can't keep my clocks straight!

So, I think that was the problem. You were thinking that time dilation was a function of field strength (the force of gravity) and I was saying the same without thinking about it—it's most certainly not the case.

~modest


----------------

Last edited by modest; 06-02-2009 at 04:02 PM..
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network