|
Not Ranked
:
+0 / -0
0 score
Re: The Fundamental Theory and the Three Fundamental Laws
Just playing around with the rationality of the fundamental laws you are addressing.
1. Everything that is, exists as everything (totality)
2. If some things exist, then everything can exist as it is, and it can exist as less than what it is, which is inherently a contradiction of every thing. Thus contradiction is permissible, where and when the belief / observation of some things are said to be existing.
3. Based on the perception of observer(s), everything is and/or it is not (everything). Existence of single solitary (and thus distinct) observers makes for plausibility that BOTH everything is and is not, while each thing is or is not.
Conclusion: Everything is No Thing and No Thing is Every Thing, except when an Observer is present and insisting that totality is (merely sum total of) some thing(s).
Measurement is prime example of "nothing" attempting to render Everything into something that is conceivably less than Everything, or that which is not (Everything).
|
