Quote:
Originally Posted by arkain101
The three laws are (based on certain areas of philosophy):
1)Law of identity - Everything that is, exists.
2)Law of contradiction - Nothing can simultaneously be and not be.
3)Law of excluded middle - Each and every thing either is or is not.
A conclusive law formed by these 3 laws is a considerable 4th subsequential law:
4)Law of conclusion - Of everything that is, it can be found why it is.
|
I have not read the rest of the OP in detail, but was immediately struck by the illogicality of the 4th law. This assertion does NOT follow from the three laws. What is knowable is an entirely different question from what is. Defining what is does not make it knowable.
