Quote:
Originally Posted by jedaisoul
I have not read the rest of the OP in detail, but was immediately struck by the illogicality of the 4th law. This assertion does NOT follow from the three laws. What is knowable is an entirely different question from what is. Defining what is does not make it knowable.
|
Partially agreed. I used statments from wikipedia, as I thought it would be a good starting point to use what I interpreted as mainstream philosophy, maybe something that people would be familiar with. However, I later realized my mistake to consider those versions of the laws of thought to be complete and sufficient for where I planned to take them.
As you read on you can see that I produced a correction of these laws based on the principles I have been developing within the overall theory.
