I regret the fact that I included those laws so early in the development of this theory. I've tried to point out that that was a mistake, but the readers seem to keep missing that.
At this point, the laws are yet to be fully described. I did not come with the laws prior to the mechanical principles. On the contrary, the laws came to a realization after the development of the following:
These laws (althought not yet defined completely) can be formed into principles of systems that apply to the theme of mechanics and other subsequent partnering themes.
They are the principles that include a)rationalization of what is irrational, and b)rationalism.
1)System of Singularality - Things can be, without inclusion of other limitations other than they are influenced by the other two systems. It has no limitations on its ability to be located at different places at different times to satisfy the following two sets demands. Think of energy (light)
The mechanical parameter that can be placed in this set is rotation orientation and/or spin.
2)System of Duality - Things can either Be or Not Be, and also Be at the same time, whole Not being at the same time. It is a two object or set system. Where it is not possible to provide the reasoning which object is moving or is not moving if motion should exist between them (motion meaning, change, events, something to observe)
A basic list of the mechanical parameters that can be placed in this set are 1) Rotation orientation and/or spin 2)Direction 3)Motion 4)Velocity 5)Distance 6)Mass 7)Energy 8)Force 9)Momentum 10)location (think of placing a ruler between yourself and the only other reference frame that is)
3)System of Triality - Things are able to be recognized as individual systems. Things either Are or Are not. That is, A is A, and not B, or B is B and Not A. Certainty is produced in this system, however it may satisfy some to call that certainty naive certainty, in the same context of naive realism.
The same basic list of the mechanical parameters apply to the triality system as the duality system. Ie, 1) Rotation orientation and/or spin 2)Direction 3)Motion 4)Velocity 5)Distance 6)Mass 7)Energy 8)Force 9)Momentum 10)location. However the central aspect that allows the duality and triality system to be considered different is the ability for a frame of reference (think of a 3 frame universe) to perform a measurment with itself considered excluded. (Think of placing a ruler between to points)
They influence each other, and can also be mutually exclusive. And it makes no change to go beyond the 3 system or below the 1 system. It is complete in its 3 set (of sets) form. I am learning that this is considered a topology.
Allow me to try to blend this into existing theory. Special Relativity Theory in its most basic expression abides to these principles. The (lorentz) transformations are contained in the duality set. The source of connection between the transformations (information/energy) is 'contained' in the singularality set. Meanwhile the triality set is what combines these former sets into a classical macroscopic picture of the universe. And by classical macroscopic picture of the universe I mean, the role the conscious observer plays as the tool to rationalize the irrational system. The triality system 'does' this based on the 3rd law, the laws of a triality system, a triality system is the beginning of macroscopicity understanding. which only demands 3 frames of reference.. We could add more, but it would not add another system, it would only a more complex version of the triality system.
Example using General Relativity.
Space-Time is treated as though it has physical qualities, the theory does not prove that these qualities exist, but it relies on the 'concept' of them none the less. The key word here is concept. Because this is a conceptual theory, it CAN be reduced into this fundamental theory.
The fundamental theory, ie the system of Singularality, Duality, and Triality (sets) can explain the validity of General Relativity. It can do this in the same way it provides the validity of the theory of special relativity. Furthermore, it is my expectation that it can explain the how/why we treat space-time as something consisting of qualities that can be warped and bent. That is, if we are understanding HOW we think we will understand how we came about to think of it this way.
Based on this, a series of experiments can be performed to test this theory I hear present.
One of those experiments (that I am developing), is a (presumed) method to create a gravity field. If the gravity field can not be created based on the expectations that the experiment requires, then this fundamental theory has contradictory evidence towards it, but if it can then it has some support.
If this theory is to have any real value, then it must make predictions, and it must have ways of being tested. Prior to this it is not nessecarally a complete theory. (explaining that I am not trying to convince anyone the validity of this theorem)
There are a number of ways it can be tested.. and thats the best news I've learned about it from day one.
. Modern Advanced physics (like a string theory model) is well known for its lack of ability to be tested, and frowned upon because of this by many. At least to my understanding..
As you can tell I have a lot of work to do to finalize this theory and its laws and principles. I am not presenting to you the Complete concept. I can only at this point share with you the basic layout of the theory as a whole.
