Science Forums 2

[arkain101]

I explained I used those laws from wikipedia for the reason they may be familiar with people. Why did I say this, because I found and read through them there.

Law of thought - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The laws of thought can be most intelligibly expressed thus:

1. Everything that is, exists.
2. Nothing can simultaneously be and not be.
3. Each and every thing either is or is not.
4. Of everything that is, it can be found why it is.

There would then have to be added only the fact that once for all in logic the question is about what is thought and hence about concepts and not about real things.

– Schopenhauer, Manuscript Remains, Vol. 4, "Pandectae II," §163

I should also note that if you read my first post you will see the following:

The above was a collaborative mixture of explanations by those mentioned authors including myself. However these laws are incomplete. Read next post.

Does this satisfy your concerns?

I don't expect that kind of attitude will be much appreciated along the development of this thread.