Quote:
Originally Posted by arkain101
I explained I used those laws from wikipedia for the reason they may be familiar with people. Why did I say this, because I found and read through them there.
I really don't see where your making these assumptions.
|
Well, thankyou for clarifying the source. I withdraw my comment about that, and apologise.
However, I would dispute that the interpretation of rule 4:
"4. Of everything that is, it can be found why it is."
corresponds to what Schopenhauer originally said:
"4. Truth is the reference of a judgement to something outside it as its sufficient reason or ground."
The former is a claim about "everything that is", the latter is about truth and judgement. There is no correlation between the two statements. However, I acknowledge that is what Schopenhauer claimed. It was not originated by you.
