As much as it looks like I used Schopenhauer's laws, I did not on purpose, nor did I depend on his reasoning, or even know his reasoning. Hence my regret for quoting them. It was a copy and paste mistake, that I've posted a few times now that those laws are incomplete for what I am discussing here.
Quote:
|
It seems clear, to me, that you are applying to physical reality
|
Yes, that is the key point to the thesis here that I am describing to you. (I don't know anything about Schopenhauer or his work, he is not related to this thread). The thesis is that, there exists a set of laws for thought(which I am still working on developing), and because of this, physical reality which can be thought about, will in one form or another abide to one or more of those laws.
I have suggestive evidence of this being accurate, which I will get into. Furthermore I will get into the matter of ways to test and validate this overall.
That is all I can respond for now, I need to get going.
However, I request we move on from the wikipage, and the laws. I am beginning with evidence first, since that is the core of where I've worked on this, the laws in according to my expression have not yet been developed, so it is meaningless to get into this further.
Thanks.
Quote:
There would then have to be added only the fact that once for all in logic the question is about what is thought and hence about concepts and not about real things.
– Schopenhauer, Manuscript Remains, Vol. 4, "Pandectae II," §163
|
I will be responding to this as well. As I have said, from where I am coming from that in quotation is incomplete. What I am doing here is attempting to show the completion, and prove it.
(however the opening post has become a bit of a disaster in my opinion. It may be worth my while to spend a little more time on that and start a new topic.)
