Have human males past their biological "use-by" date?
Biologically we are probably here to protect the
female; provide for her food and shelter needs and help her pass on
her mitochondrial DNA.
Does
She really need males any more?
She can provide for these needs herself and only a few dozen
males are needed to provide sperm for babies. With a turkey baster and/or a fertility clinic
she can do the rest
Protecting
Males seem to have got this all wrong
Since the invention of the Gattaling/Machine-Gun,high explosives and now rockets and nuclear bombs, conventional warfare seems useless and mostly un-winnable.
The world should have realised this after WW1.
Males continually rape
women and even
babies (S. Africa, Australia, most war zones)
Males are aggressive, take unnecessary risks and are anti-social. Jails are full mainly of males who rob, murder, bash and rape.
Providing
Economically males have shown they are self-aggrandising, selfish, dishonest, dissembling and devious. This has led to a collapse of the world banking system.
Providing Food
The food males provide is polluted with chemicals that accumulate in fatty breast tiissue and cause disease, tetrogeny and cancer. Males want to control nature, rather than working with nature
So would
Homo sapiens, the species be better off without most human males?
