Science Forums 2

[HydrogenBond]

Males are visual animals and females are more verbal (on the average). The difference this creates is in terms of reality perception, is the male visual allows for better cause and effect perception and extrapolation in physical reality. The reason this is so, is because verbal images can be manipulated easier/faster than the visuals within physical reality. It will take time to set up a magic trick to manipulate visual reality. But one can lie in the blink of an eye. The male has more time for confirming reality.

With words, I can say, I am going to build a bridge made of spaghetti. This can not be done in physical reality, because common sense visual extrapolation will not allow this to materialize visually. But the verbal image of a spaghetti bridge, with the proper sales pitch, especially if it creates confidence and positive emotion, may make it seem possible, to anyone who has limited physical visualization for extrapolation.

This difference is why so many guys are able to lie to women, in the short term. The guy can see his visual limitations within reality. They can also create verbal illusions, out of touch with this reality, banking on the lower visual reality skills of females, knowing that not all female will be as able to extrapolate into physical or visual reality.

Education, in all forms, creates the verbal link to fill in the visual limitations of the female. She can learn to extrapolate via procedure to get the same final effect. Male common sense and his visual nature, allows him to fill this in with less education. This allows men to pioneer new areas where the verbal is not yet in place.

For example, the male driver will often try to find the way to an unknown location without stopping to ask, because he is trying to use his visual skills, which often have atrophied. The female will prefer to depend on verbal advice to oriented her. If the advice is good this may be the faster way. But if it is bad advice, the visual path is less effected.

Mothers have a strong influence on their sons. If the mother allows the son to be spoiled and manipulative, she is molding her son to do that to other women, so other women can blame the male. Since this relationship is reality cause and effect , she it may not be able to see it, but will do this based on something she verbally learned in the latest book, without visual conformation.

The strong father will discipline the spoiled son, because he can visually extrapolate behavior, potentially helping the future women. But other male illusionists, catering to the verbal needs of females, have neutralized the father. With the loss of the strong father figure, sons are being conditioned to depend more on verbal, like the females, creating he-she. This is the male, that some women don't see much use for. Other females defend males, but of the other type; reliable vision.