Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 06-28-2009   #14 (permalink)
modest's Avatar
modest
Creating


Location:
U.S. Midwest
 
modest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond reputemodest has a reputation beyond repute
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Sunlight Sterilization of Water

Quote:
Originally Posted by Turtle View Post
i found some stuff.

a list of some 'germs' and the UV dose needed to kill them: >> Germicidal Disinfection Information
I think that info should give an idea if whether your UltraViolet Portable Absorption Sterilizing System (UV-PASS ) should work.

According to the chart you link, bacteria need between 3620 and 22000 microwatts per centimeter squared of UV to be sterilized. The only convincing source I could find on the amount of UV the earth's surface receives is this page. It gives between approx. 400 and 1800 µW/cm2 for UV-A.

Needing 22,000 µW/cm2 and having (on the low end) 500 µW/cm2, you would need the surface of the magnifying glass to be (22000 / 500) 44 times larger than the surface of the target. That's not that bad really. If the target is one square centimeter then that's only a magnifying glass with a radius of (sqrt(44/pi)) 3.74 centimeters which is a diameter of about 3 inches.

That sounds very doable. The only thing I would worry about is how much UV the magnifying glass and the glass tube absorb. If it is something like 50 percent each then you'd have to make the area of the magnifying glass 4 times larger.

In thinking about whether the above numbers could be correct I'm reminded that my UV light keeping my pond clear of algae is 9 watts and I figure the surface area it illuminates is about 315 cm2 which comes out to 38,100 µW/cm2 which isn't much higher than the 22,000 that the magnifying glass with a diameter of 3 inches would achieve. And my UV light is very good at killing algae and water moves through the light very quickly.

I would wonder about parasites though. According to your chart protozoa require quite a bit more UV to kill. Are water-borne parasites protozoa? I wonder if that's the kind of thing the chart is referring to between 26,400 and 318,000 µW/cm2. It would be discouraging if the intensity needed to be that high, but this is encouraging:
The United States Department of Health has determined that a UV system should provide a minimum of 16,000 Microwatts per Centimeter Square.

Information on portable water purification and portable water systems
~modest


----------------
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network