Quote:
Originally Posted by lemit
Lawcat, I usually avoid math since I can't understand it, but the result of your argument seems so counter-intuitive that I have to ask if you can explain it. I have to warn you: I'm really dumb.
Again, thanks for this site. I'm very happy to be here.
--lemit
|
Lemit, you can go here and examine it.
http://hypography.com/forums/physics...obability.html
My basic premise was that: since the number of consecutive sequences (1,2,3,4,5,6; 2,3,4,5,6,7; ,3,4,5,6,7,8, etc) is much smaller than the humber of possible non-consecutive sequences, then the probability is less.
