not uranus, at least according to the tome everyone is sniping at.
possibly one of uranus' moons man.
nothing like some specific examples of a whole lot of general dooky, hey?
to whit!:
The Inhabited Worlds; The Urantia Book: Paper 49
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fiction Authors of the Early 20th Cenury, of Questionable Repute
49:0.4 Not all planets are suited to harbor mortal life. Small ones having a high rate of axial revolution are wholly unsuited for life habitats. In several of the physical systems of Satania the planets revolving around the central sun are too large for habitation, their great mass occasioning oppressive gravity. Many of these enormous spheres have satellites, sometimes a half dozen or more, and these moons are often in size very near that of Urantia, so that they are almost ideal for habitation.
...
49:2.1 There is a standard and basic pattern of vegetable and animal life in each system. But the Life Carriers are oftentimes confronted with the necessity of modifying these basic patterns to conform to the varying physical conditions which confront them on numerous worlds of space. They foster a generalized system type of mortal creature, but there are seven distinct physical types as well as thousands upon thousands of minor variants of these seven outstanding differentiations:
1.Atmospheric types.
2.Elemental types.
3.Gravity types.
4.Temperature types.
5.Electric types.
6.Energizing types.
7.Unnamed types ...
|
there is no such thing as gravity; Urantia sucks.
