Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 03-22-2005   #9 (permalink)
Biochemist's Avatar
Biochemist
Eccentric Heretic


Location:
Portland, OR
 
Biochemist is infamous around these partsBiochemist is infamous around these partsBiochemist is infamous around these parts
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Can a random system produce an ordered system?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishteacher73
As I brought up earlier, there is debate on whether the universe is deterministic (Due to the basic physics of it) or random..Check out this thread for a discussion on it Biochem., its pretty good. I started on the side of free will, but eventually conceded to the deterministic view. ...http://www.hypography.com/sciencefor...ead.php?t=1783...
One must rememer that even primordial Earth was a very complex system ....This pathway is chaotic, but not random. Given the original inputs, I feel that a very similar outcome is likely.
Thanks for the reference to this thread, FT. I have to admit that I was making the same transition (initially thinking random, moving to deterministic.) I am frankly having a hard time getting my head around the notion of C1ay's quark-gluon plasma (above) being deterministic, but that is really only because the complexity is so high. We could have had a deterministic chaotic environment with extraordinary complexity. It suggests that the level of complexity at the instant of the Big Bang was highest, and all subsequent systems formed were of less complexity as they organized. We eventually arrived at some systems that are not even chaotic. FT- Was that your conclusion?

Since we are in the philosophy thread (i.e., not basic science thread) I feel obligated to point out that acceptance of determinism does not obligate one to assume absence of free will. (I am only bringing this up to clarify nomenclature.) We still have the "first casue" issue: If a Creator set the Big Bang in play, the Creator could have separated some elements from the determinism, notably free will. If you think the deterministic nature of the universe was established in the absence of a Creator, this is Naturalism. If you think a Creator set the Big Bang in play (presumably with some intent), you are one of several categories of theist.

One interesting corollary: If we think the universe was deterministic since the Big Bang, this means it is the source of all information load. This means the the information load in DNA is miniscule compared to the information load in the Big Bang initial state.

(You notice I had to sneak some biochemistry back into the discussion.)


----------------
Few problems are so complex that they cannot be substantially clarified by one more cup of coffee (or a nice cabernet if it is after 5:00)

Moderator in absentia. Return anticipated. Timing somewhat vague.

Last edited by Biochemist; 03-22-2005 at 09:23 AM..
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 30.00%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 40.00%
4 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 30.00%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 10
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:45 PM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network