Go Back   Science Forums
View Single Post
Old 10-10-2009   #8 (permalink)
LaurieAG's Avatar
LaurieAG
Explaining


Location:
South East Queensland, Australia
 
LaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to beholdLaurieAG is a splendid one to behold
 



Not Ranked  0 score     
Re: Methods of Discount

Hi Lemit,

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemit View Post
(Of course we all know that, once terms are established, all economists say pretty much the same thing. That's why so few of them even bother to publish.)

So I'll keep working on that, and I'll get back to you later.
The interface between politics, economics, business and finance is a place not of this real world, a place where things like perpetual motion machines happen.

Consider depreciation of PC's when they were completely written off over 3 years (now 3.5) with a business tax rate of 33%. If you replace one third of your PC's each year and depreciate all of your PC's by one third each year then the savings in profit from the depreciation (deducted from business profits before tax) will be equal to the original cost of buying the retired PC's 3 years ago.

If you combine all of the various aspects of the downsides outlined in my previous post with the perpetual motion machine you end up with something that I call the Leveraged Depreciated User Paid Leasing System. I won't go into real detail but the system involves a wholly owned subsidiary providing 3x leveraged PC's on lease to a parent company (a real world application (and there was one) would involve a partnership of large members of the same industry, who all owned a share of the 'subsidiary' proportional to their industry requirements, but would still be equivalent).

A 3xleveraged depreciated User paid leasing system with a 10% Goods and Services Tax (GST) would return 1.36 to the Government as tax, 2.56 in profit to the userers and the poor old useree will pay 6 for something that chould have been done entirely internally and only cost 1 to the user through their government.

This Crony Capitalist system is the basis for a mathematical proof I call the 'Godellian disproof of global unregulated leverage', I'll dig it up if you like. Basically the results change when you change all of your OR's in your original equation to AND's. i.e. x= a OR b OR c and x = a AND(+) b AND(+) c are totally different.

And then we can get onto kickbacks vs vendor comissions, later.


----------------
Corollary to the Peter Principle: Once you have promoted all of your competents to their highest level of incompetence you must change your management philosophy from top down to bottom up, because the staff at the bottom are the only competent ones in your entire organisation.
Reply With Quote
 
» Advertisement
» Current Poll
Who's the sexiest man alive? Johnny Depp or Robert Pattinson?
Johnny Depp - 27.27%
3 Votes
Robert Pattinson - 0%
0 Votes
Someone else (please specify) - 45.45%
5 Votes
I'm too macho to think a guy is sexy - 27.27%
3 Votes
Total Votes: 11
You may not vote on this poll.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:22 AM.

Hypography?

Hypography [n.]: A combination of "hyperlink" and "bibliography" - ie, a list of links to electronic documents. Comparable to discography and bibliography, but not cartography.

We have been online since May 2000, and aim to be the best place to find and share science-related content of all kinds.

Share the love!

Please add more science to your life. Use our RSS feeds on your blog, your portal, or your favorite feedreader!


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2000-2009 Hypography
Part of the Hypography - Science for Everyone Network