This post and replies to it have been moved to this silly claims forum thread, because the strange claim they discuss isn’t up to the standard of an engineering forum thread. After it improved, with the addition of actual sketches of the described machine, new posts were moved to “Eccentric slew ring wheel perpetual motion machine”
I agree with TEguy,
I myself, have designed an overbalancing wheel that has LESS weights
on the 'turning' side than on the 'opposing' side. The difference here being, the TOTAL
distance of all weights (added up), is less on the 'opposing' side, than on the turning
side ----- this is what causes the imbalance ----- NOT the number of weights!
For example; if the total distance, on one side of the hub, equals 50cms for 5 weights,
and each weight equals 10kgs, it is the same as placing one (1) weight (at 10kgs), at
the 'total distance' of ALL the weights ----- 50cms!
If, on the 'turning' side, the total distance is 100cms (even though there may well be less
weights), the wheel WILL overbalance.
Sir Isaac Einstein.
