Quote:
Originally posted by: IrishEyes
Still though, what about the definitive proof? What would it take to convinve you of God, sanctus?
|
Sorry I saw the question just the third time I read it, so my answer comes cronologically the wrong way around.
It depends already on which god! The god of the bible, I think nothing would convnce me (I can't just believe in something like adam and eva and the snake and the apple and the universal flood and the existence of Jesus as a son of god-- as a philosopher yes-- for me this isn't serious (i.e. with the feet on the ground) it's like beliving in santa). This isn't supposed to be a judgement, it is just my reason not to believe in this god.
If you tell me god is that what created everything? Then if you say the anti-symmetrie at the creation of the universe between matter and anti-matter (which made that not all matter and anti-matter was transformed into energy again) is god, then you could convince me. I would never have called it god, even if it satisfies all the criterias of god, it has been since ever, will be forever, it's omnipresent and therefore omniscent.
So you see a definitive proof would be an objective proof (in my own definition) or a proof (in freethinkers definition).
